MariaPoveda (Talk | contribs) m (Article is waiting for review.) |
MariaPoveda (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{{Logical OP General Template | {{Logical OP General Template | ||
|Name=Inverse n-ary relationship | |Name=Inverse n-ary relationship | ||
− | |SubmittedBy=MariaPoveda | + | |SubmittedBy=MariaPoveda, MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa, |
|Author=MariaPoveda, MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa, | |Author=MariaPoveda, MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa, | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Additional information header}} | {{Additional information header}} | ||
− | + | [[Category:Waiting for review]] | |
{{Scenarios about me}} | {{Scenarios about me}} | ||
{{Reviews about me}} | {{Reviews about me}} | ||
{{Modeling issues about me}} | {{Modeling issues about me}} | ||
{{My references}} | {{My references}} | ||
− | + | {{Submission to event | |
+ | |Event=WOP:2010 | ||
+ | }} |
Diagram
Name | Inverse n-ary relationship |
---|---|
Also known as | |
Author(s) | MariaPoveda, MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa |
SubmittedBy | MariaPoveda, MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa |
Motivation | Express the inverse relationship of a n-ary one. The n-ary relationships could be due to: (a) a binary relationship really needs a further argument; (b) two binary relationships always go together and should be represented as one n-ary relation; (c) a relationship that is really amongst several things. |
---|---|
Aim | This pattern aims to allow asking for n-ary relationships and its inverse without a complex query involving the class created to support the n-ary relation between the origin and destiantion classes of the n-ary relationship. |
Solution description | |
Elements | Class, Relationship, Attribute and inverseOf |
Implementation | |
Reusable component | |
Component type |
Origin | Logical Pattern for Modelling N-ary Relation: Introducing a New Class for the Relation |
---|---|
Known use | |
Reference | |
Related ODP | Logical Pattern for Modelling N-ary Relation: Introducing a New Class for the Relation |
Used in combination with | Logical Pattern for Modelling N-ary Relation: Introducing a New Class for the Relation |
Test |
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
This revision (revision ID 9844) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
![]() |
Submission to event |
---|