(New page: {{Content OP Proposal Template |Name=Classification |Intent=To represent the relations between concepts (roles, task, parameters) and entities (person, events, values), which concepts can ...) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Intent=To represent the relations between concepts (roles, task, parameters) and entities (person, events, values), which concepts can be assigned to. To formalize the application (e.g. tagging) of informal knowledge organization systems such as lexica, thesauri, subject directories, folksonomies, etc., where concepts are first-order elements. | |Intent=To represent the relations between concepts (roles, task, parameters) and entities (person, events, values), which concepts can be assigned to. To formalize the application (e.g. tagging) of informal knowledge organization systems such as lexica, thesauri, subject directories, folksonomies, etc., where concepts are first-order elements. | ||
|Domain=Community:General | |Domain=Community:General | ||
| − | |CompetencyQuestion=What concept is assigned to this entity?, Which category does this entity belong to? | + | |CompetencyQuestion=What concept is assigned to this entity?, Which category does this entity belong to? |
|ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/classification.owl | |ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/classification.owl | ||
| − | |Consequences=It is possible to make assertions about e.g., categories, types, roles, which are typically considered at the meta-level of an ontology. Instances of Concept reify such elements, which are therefore put in the ordinary domain of an ontology. It is not possible to parametrize the classification over different dimensions e.g., time, space, etc. | + | |Consequences=It is possible to make assertions about e.g., categories, types, roles, which are typically considered at the meta-level of an ontology. Instances of Concept reify such elements, which are therefore put in the ordinary domain of an ontology. It is not possible to parametrize the classification over different dimensions e.g., time, space, etc. |
| − | + | ||
|Scenario=Mac OSX 10.5 is classified as an operating system in the Fujitsu-Siemens product catalog. | |Scenario=Mac OSX 10.5 is classified as an operating system in the Fujitsu-Siemens product catalog. | ||
|KnownUse=http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DUL.owl | |KnownUse=http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DUL.owl | ||
| Name: | Classification |
|---|---|
| Submitted by: | |
| Also Known As: | |
| Intent: | To represent the relations between concepts (roles, task, parameters) and entities (person, events, values), which concepts can be assigned to. To formalize the application (e.g. tagging) of informal knowledge organization systems such as lexica, thesauri, subject directories, folksonomies, etc., where concepts are first-order elements. |
| Domains: | |
| Competency Questions: | |
| Solution description: | |
| Reusable OWL Building Block: | 1 (77) |
| Consequences: | It is possible to make assertions about e.g., categories, types, roles, which are typically considered at the meta-level of an ontology. Instances of Concept reify such elements, which are therefore put in the ordinary domain of an ontology. It is not possible to parametrize the classification over different dimensions e.g., time, space, etc. |
| Scenarios: | Mac OSX 10.5 is classified as an operating system in the Fujitsu-Siemens product catalog. |
| Known Uses: | http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DUL.owl |
| Web References: | |
| Other References: | NeOn Deliverable 2.5.1 |
| Examples (OWL files): | |
| Extracted From: | |
| Reengineered From: | |
| Has Components: | |
| Specialization Of: | |
| Related CPs: |
This revision (revision ID 141) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
'Ontology Design Patterns'