m (Article is waiting for review.) |
m (Edited in response to reviewer feedback -- added GPU) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Graphical representation header}} | {{Graphical representation header}} | ||
{{Graphical representation | {{Graphical representation | ||
− | |ImageName=ComputationalEnvironment. | + | |ImageName=ComputationalEnvironment.jpeg |
}} | }} | ||
{{Content OP Proposal Template | {{Content OP Proposal Template | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
{{Element list header}} | {{Element list header}} | ||
{{Additional information header}} | {{Additional information header}} | ||
− | + | [[Category:Waiting for review]] | |
{{Scenarios about me}} | {{Scenarios about me}} | ||
{{Reviews about me}} | {{Reviews about me}} | ||
{{Modeling issues about me}} | {{Modeling issues about me}} | ||
{{My references}} | {{My references}} | ||
− |
Diagram
Name: | ComputationalEnvironment |
---|---|
Submitted by: | MichelleCheatham |
Also Known As: | |
Intent: | The pattern is intended to support comparison and reproducibility of computational analyses. |
Domains: | |
Competency Questions: |
– What environment do I need to put in place in order to replicate the work in Paper X? – There has been an error found in Script Y. Which analyses need to be re-run? – Based on recent research in Field Z
students work to become familiar with? – Are the results from Study A and Study B comparable from a computational environment perspective? |
Solution description: | The Computational Environment ontology design pattern models the environment in which a computational analysis was conducted down to the hardware level. |
Reusable OWL Building Block: | 1 (0) |
Consequences: | |
Scenarios: | The tool Wireshark was run on a particular computer in order to analyze network traffic. |
Known Uses: | |
Web References: | |
Other References: | |
Examples (OWL files): | |
Extracted From: | |
Reengineered From: | |
Has Components: | |
Specialization Of: | |
Related CPs: |
The ComputationalEnvironment Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
This revision (revision ID 13282) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab