EnricoDaga (Talk | contribs) (New page: {{TitleDescription Template |Title=Distinguishing Open and QC Reviews |Description=** each Proposed Content OP has the possibility to be reviewed from its page by clicking on 'post a revie...) |
EnricoDaga (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TitleDescription Template | {{TitleDescription Template | ||
|Title=Distinguishing Open and QC Reviews | |Title=Distinguishing Open and QC Reviews | ||
| − | |Description= | + | |Description= |
| − | + | * each Proposed Content OP has the possibility to be reviewed from its page by clicking on 'post a review'. <del>But if you are not a member of the QC you face an error page.</del> (fixed -enrico) | |
| − | + | * I would like to fix this in the following way: | |
| − | + | ** We allow all registered user to post a review but we distinguish QC reviews from open ones. | |
| − | + | ** Is it possible to have only one link in the page (the one that is already there) and to redirect the user to either an 'Open Review' if (s)he is not a QC member, or to the official review if (s)he is a QC member? | |
| − | + | * Motivations are the following: | |
| − | + | ** The regular discussion pages are not effectively perceived from users. | |
| − | + | ** We <del>want</del> now have actually an open review mechanism as well as an official one. | |
| + | ** <del>It is bad that a user is faced with an error page when his/her intent is to post a comment on a wiki. At least (s)he should be redirected to the correct page where is allowed to post. However, t would be much better to make such process transparent to the user (as described above).</del> -fixed | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Task Template | {{Task Template | ||
Title: Distinguishing Open and QC Reviews
Description: * each Proposed Content OP has the possibility to be reviewed from its page by clicking on 'post a review'. But if you are not a member of the QC you face an error page. (fixed -enrico)
Sub-tasks: This task has no sub-tasks
'Ontology Design Patterns'