MariaPoveda (Talk | contribs) m |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Content OP Proposal Template | {{Content OP Proposal Template | ||
− | |SubmittedBy=MariaPoveda, MariCarmenDeFigueroa, | + | |SubmittedBy=MariaPoveda, MariCarmenDeFigueroa, |
|Name=SimpleOrAggregated | |Name=SimpleOrAggregated | ||
− | |Intent= | + | |Intent=The goal of this pattern is to represent in a non-transitive way objects that are either aggegated members of other objects or have aggegated members. |
|Domain=Parts and Collections, | |Domain=Parts and Collections, | ||
|CompetencyQuestion=What elements are aggregated members of this object?, What is this object aggregated member of? | |CompetencyQuestion=What elements are aggregated members of this object?, What is this object aggregated member of? | ||
|ContentODPDescription=- | |ContentODPDescription=- | ||
|ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=http://delicias.dia.fi.upm.es/ontologies/SimpleOrAggregated.owl | |ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=http://delicias.dia.fi.upm.es/ontologies/SimpleOrAggregated.owl | ||
− | |Consequences=This Content OP allows designers to represent | + | |Consequences=This Content OP allows designers to represent simple individuals of a given concept (that is, an individual that is made up of itself) and aggregated individuals of a given concept (that is, an individual that is made up of several invidivuals of the same concept). |
− | + | In summary, this pattern allows to represent both simple objects and aggregated objects and their members. | |
+ | In addition, this pattern can be used to detect the following contradictory situation by means of applying a reasoner: 'to instanciate the relationship "hasAggregatedMember" for an Object that belongs to "SimpleObject"'. This situation represents a consistency error and it is detected when a resoner is applied due to the following modelling decisions included in the pattern: (a) "AggregatedObject" class represents the "hasAggregatedMember" domain and (b) it is disjoint with "SimpleObject". | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Element list header}} | {{Element list header}} |
Diagram
Name: | SimpleOrAggregated |
---|---|
Submitted by: | MariaPoveda, MariCarmenDeFigueroa |
Also Known As: | |
Intent: | The goal of this pattern is to represent in a non-transitive way objects that are either aggegated members of other objects or have aggegated members. |
Domains: | |
Competency Questions: | |
Solution description: | - |
Reusable OWL Building Block: | 1 (604) |
Consequences: | This Content OP allows designers to represent simple individuals of a given concept (that is, an individual that is made up of itself) and aggregated individuals of a given concept (that is, an individual that is made up of several invidivuals of the same concept).
In summary, this pattern allows to represent both simple objects and aggregated objects and their members. In addition, this pattern can be used to detect the following contradictory situation by means of applying a reasoner: 'to instanciate the relationship "hasAggregatedMember" for an Object that belongs to "SimpleObject"'. This situation represents a consistency error and it is detected when a resoner is applied due to the following modelling decisions included in the pattern: (a) "AggregatedObject" class represents the "hasAggregatedMember" domain and (b) it is disjoint with "SimpleObject". |
Scenarios: | |
Known Uses: | |
Web References: | |
Other References: | |
Examples (OWL files): | |
Extracted From: | |
Reengineered From: | |
Has Components: | |
Specialization Of: | |
Related CPs: |
The SimpleOrAggregated Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
Un objeto resultante de la agregación de dos o más objetos.
Cualquier objeto fÃsico, social o mental o sustancia.
Un objeto simple, es decir, un objeto que no tiene objetos agregados.
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
This revision (revision ID 9922) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
![]() |
Submission to event |
---|