Submissions:SimpleOrAggregated Revision as of 07:17, 20 August 2010 by MariaPoveda (Talk | contribs) (Article is waiting for review.) (diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Warning!

This is an old revision. Go to current revision

This pattern has been certified.

Related submission, with evaluation history, can be found here

Last modified date is: 2010-08-20

Graphical representation

Diagram

General description

Name:	SimpleOrAggregated
Submitted by:	MariaPoveda
Also Known As:
Intent:	To represent (non-transitively) that objects either are aggegated members of other objects, or have aggegated members.
Domains:	Parts and Collections
Competency Questions:	What elements are aggregated members of this object? What is this object aggregated member of?
Solution description:	-
Reusable OWL Building Block:	1 (604)
Consequences:	This Content OP allows designers to represent aggregations relations.
Scenarios:
Known Uses:
Web References:
Other References:
Examples (OWL files):
Extracted From:
Reengineered From:
Has Components:
Specialization Of:
Related CPs:

Elements

The SimpleOrAggregated Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:

hasAggregatedMember (owl:ObjectProperty)

hasAggregatedMember page

isAggregatedMemberOf (owl:ObjectProperty)

isAggregatedMemberOf page

AggregatedObject (owl:Class) An object that is an aggregation of two or more objects.

Un objeto resultante de la agregación de dos o más objetos.

AggregatedObject page

Object (owl:Class) Any physical, social, or mental object, or a substance.

Cualquier objeto físico, social o mental o sustancia.

Object page

ObjectByCardinality (owl:Class)

ObjectByCardinality page

SimpleObject (owl:Class) A simple object, that is, an object that has no aggregated objects.

Un objeto simple, es decir, un objeto que no tiene objetos agregados.

SimpleObject page

Scenarios

Scenarios about SimpleOrAggregated

No scenario is added to this Content OP.

Reviews

Reviews about SimpleOrAggregated

There is no review about this proposal.

Some subquery has no valid condition.

This revision (revision ID 9869) takes in account the reviews: none

Other info at evaluation tab

Modeling issues

Modeling issues about SimpleOrAggregated

There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.

Some subquery has no valid condition.

References

Add a reference

	Submission to event WOP:2010