Submissions:An Ontology Design Pattern for Activity Reasoning Revision as of 01:11, 16 September 2014 by YingjieHu (Talk | contribs) (Imported from OWL file.) (diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Warning!

This is an old revision. Go to current revision

This pattern has been certified.

Related submission, with evaluation history, can be found here

Last modified date is: 2014-09-16

Graphical representation

Diagram (this article has no graphical representation)

General description

Name:	An Ontology Design Pattern for Activity Reasoning
Submitted by:	YingjieHu
Also Known As:
Intent:	To incorporate the general two perspectives of activities: a workflow perspective, which are often observed in planning-related applications, and a spatiotemporal perspective, which are often found in geographic activity analysis.
Domains:
Competency Questions:	What are the requirements to complete an activity? Which places are involved in the activity? Can other planned activities/tasks be combined with this activity? Which chained activities are necessary to achieve this activity? Which activities are afforded by specific places? Where and when to acquire an activity-relevant object?
Solution description:
Reusable OWL Building Block:	1 (512)
Consequences:	Only two perspectives for activities are included in this pattern. While these two perspectives are commonly observed in existing work, other views toward activities may also need to be supported in future work.
Scenarios:	Activity or task planning. Help find out which activities should be completed before other activities. Activity decomposition. Find out what are the sub-activities that constitute the super activity. Spatiotemporal queries. Find out the activities that happen at particular locations and time.
Known Uses:
Web References:
Other References:
Examples (OWL files):
Extracted From:
Reengineered From:
Has Components:
Specialization Of:
Related CPs:

Elements

The An Ontology Design Pattern for Activity Reasoning Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:

hasDependent (owl:ObjectProperty)

hasDependent page

hasOutcome (owl:ObjectProperty)

hasOutcome page

hasPart (owl:ObjectProperty)

hasPart page

hasParticipant (owl:ObjectProperty)

hasParticipant page

hasRequirement (owl:ObjectProperty)

hasRequirement page

isDependentOf (owl:ObjectProperty)

isDependentOf page

isPartOf (owl:ObjectProperty)

isPartOf page

isPrecededBy (owl:ObjectProperty)

isPrecededBy page

isRequirementOf (owl:ObjectProperty)

isRequirementOf page

precedes (owl:ObjectProperty)

precedes page

produces (owl:ObjectProperty)

produces page

supports (owl:ObjectProperty)

supports page

takesPlaceAt (owl:ObjectProperty)

takesPlaceAt page

hasDuration (owl:DatatypeProperty)

hasDuration page

hasEnd (owl:DatatypeProperty)

hasEnd page

hasStart (owl:DatatypeProperty)

hasStart page

Activity (owl:Class)

Activity page

FixedActivity (owl:Class)

FixedActivity page

FlexibleActivity (owl:Class)

FlexibleActivity page

Outcome (owl:Class)

Outcome page

Place (owl:Class)

Place page

Requirement (owl:Class)

Requirement page

Scenarios

Scenarios about An Ontology Design Pattern for Activity Reasoning

No scenario is added to this Content OP.

Reviews

Reviews about An Ontology Design Pattern for Activity Reasoning

There is no review about this proposal.

Some subquery has no valid condition.

This revision (revision ID 11968) takes in account the reviews: none

Other info at evaluation tab

Modeling issues

Modeling issues about An Ontology Design Pattern for Activity Reasoning

There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.

Some subquery has no valid condition.

References

Add a reference

While this pattern so far focuses on human activities, the agents that are involved in this pattern may also be other autonomous agents, such as animals.