Community:CatherineRoussey about LinnaeanTaxonomy
Revision as of 10:32, 22 May 2013 by CatherineRoussey (Talk | contribs) (New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2013-05-22 |SubmittedBy=CatherineRoussey |ContentOPUnderReview=LinnaeanTaxonomy |RevisionID=9097 |Score=1 - needs minor revision |Review...)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

CatherineRoussey about LinnaeanTaxonomy (Revision ID: 9097)

Overall suggestion (score): 1 - needs minor revision

Review Summary: in taxonomy domain, the number of rank is not fixed.

A taxonomy should contain at least the rank : species, genus, family, order, class, gender, phylum, kingdom. These rank are called major rank. But more rank can be specified like subspecies, super family, variety etc... see the wikipedia page for more information http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxonomic_rank

Thus the universal restriction constraints should be removed to be used by any kind of taxonomy. The constraint that fix the direct parent rank in the taxonomy can not be specified in this pattern.

Reviewer Confidence:

Problems:

Community Relevance:

Relation to Best Practices:

Reusability:

Relations to Other Patterns:

Overall Understandability:

Clear Problem Description:

Clear Relevance and Consequences:

Clear Figures and Illustrations:

Missing Information:

Posted: 2013-05-22 Last modified: 2013/05/22

All reviews | Add a comment at the bottom of this page