Reviews:StefanoDavid about OnlynessIsLoneliness (OIL)
Revision as of 14:07, 10 September 2009 by StefanoDavid(Talk | contribs)(New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2009/9/10 |SubmittedBy=StefanoDavid |ContentOPUnderReview=OnlynessIsLoneliness (OIL) |RevisionID=5787 |Score=1 - needs minor revision |R...)
Problems: * I would rephrase the problem statement: I would suggest to call "problem" the modeling error (which is obviously an Anti-Pattern, as it causes the ontology to become useless), and "pattern" the proposed solution.
There are different hydrontologies in the "Pattern solution example": I would point only to one of them, as they seem very similar, and use it also as use case.
Although the hydrontologies seem to be some official Spanish knowledge bases, I would rather use an english version of a part of them that clearly states the problem, as it is not so comfortable to search in the whole ontology the pattern.
I would extend the definition of this pattern by suggesting that it is allowed the use of multiple restrictions (i.e., C1 subClassOf R only C2, ... ,C1 subClassOf R only Cn) to be combined in a single disjointness axiom, e.g., for those languages, like OWL2, that allow DisjointClasses into a single axiom:
C1 subClassOf R only (C2 or ... or Cn); disjointClasses (C2, ... Cn)
"We have categorized them into three groups:". There are no three groups in the remainder, but the description of three classes
'Ontology Design Patterns'