Diagram
Name: | SpeciesNames |
---|---|
Submitted by: | AldoGangemi |
Also Known As: | |
Intent: | To express the terminological variants and the conceptual similarity that can be sources of confusion between species. |
Domains: | |
Competency Questions: | |
Solution description: | -- |
Reusable OWL Building Block: | 1 (384) |
Consequences: | Terminological and conceptual similarity between species can be encoded byusing the three properties in this pattern. |
Scenarios: | give me the species containing local name 'oyster'; give me the synonyms and localnames for species 'Ostrica gigas'; give me the species with which species 'Ostrica gigas' can be confused |
Known Uses: | |
Web References: | |
Other References: | |
Examples (OWL files): | |
Extracted From: | |
Reengineered From: | |
Has Components: | |
Specialization Of: | |
Related CPs: |
The SpeciesNames Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
Mappable to fi:Species, fi:SpeciesRef, fi:SpeciesFeature, etc.
It has related axioms from FIGIS Schema that are included in the classes linked to the fi:Species class, such as fi:SpeciesRef (holding association with fi:AqResRef, which holds association with fi:WaterAreaRef).
(type): http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology
(imports): http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl
(versionInfo): 1.0
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
This revision (revision ID 9128) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab