Edit Content OP Proposal Review Edit Form: Reviews:ValentinaPresutti about Context Slices

From Odp

You have to log in to edit pages.

Warning!

Note that each Review is related to the version of the Content OP Proposal's page in the moment the review's page is created the first time. Edit this page only if you want to change, add or clarify the review. In general, better you do a new review, instead of editing this page.

Change review

Input your review in the fields below. If you are unsure of the meaning of the fields, click on the question mark to get an explanation.

The "overall suggestion" should reflect your overall suggestion for this submission, and should be motivated in the responses to the review questions.

Try to cover as many of the aspects as possible, and if applicable give detailed suggestions to the author how to improve and revise the submission.

Thank you for contributing!

Overall suggestion (score) info.png (-1) : This is not an appropriate submission, in case the author wishes to revise it a new submission is needed => suggest to reject it! (0) : The submission needs a major revision to be certified, the author should revise it and ask for a new review => suggest to reiterate with new reviews! (1) : The submission needs a minor revision to be certified, after revision the pattern can be certified without a new review (reviewers should give detailed recommendations) => suggest minor revision! (2) : The submission is ready for certification => suggest accepting it for certification! :
Review Summary info.pngSummarize the main points of your review here. Make sure to motivate the overall score, and if you have any direct questions to the author please state them here. This field is associated with the property This is a property of type Text. :	The pattern is interesting and useful, and well described besides possible improvements that can be done. A nice problem, very often met in real ontology engineering situations. It would give us the opportunity to have a very interesting discussion at the workshop, I am sure. In summary my comments are the followings: I see a clear analogy with the DnS (Description and Situation) Content ODP, however I can see the additional value given by a more intuitive and specific vocabulary for a "context terminology" and the additional more specific axioms. I would ask the author to describe why CS provides a benefit with respect to RDF reification of statements. I didn't know the concept of "obtainment" (my fault) but it's still unclear why CS allows more than reification of obtainment. Additionally I have a question (maybe the author wants to add something in the description that avoids this potential doubt): are contextual projections conceived as concepts? I mean, the object is one, its projection is a concept representing the object's interpretation in a certain situation (context). Makes sense?
Reviewer Confidence info.pngPlease describe your confidence with respect to different aspects such as ODPs in general, the problem addressed, and the domain of the pattern, rather than giving one overall assessment. This field is associated with the property Property:HasReviewconfidence :	High

Review the pattern "content" and input your detailed comments below:

Problems info.pngAre there any problems or even errors in the pattern? Do you have suggestions for correcting the problems? This field is associated with the property This is a property of type Text. :	An inaccuracy that I noticed is that this ODP is a Content ODP while the author refers to it as a Logical ODP. At least according to the taxonomy of ODPs currently used in this portal. Such taxonomy is not a law of course, but provides reasonable distinctions, useful for building a "pattern language" in a community like the one we are building altogether. The motivation why I would define it as a content ODP is that it provides a vocabulary and can be easily put in a partial order hierarchy, such as that of CPs.
Community Relevance info.pngIs this pattern relevant? Does it solve an important problem of the domain? Or is it for example a trivial solution or a solution to a very specific problem interesting only to a few people? This field is associated with the property This is a property of type Text. :	The pattern can be potentially applied to all domains. A possible application is the representation of knowledge to be filtered based on contextual constraints, and/or preferences.
Relation to Best Practices info.pngDoes the pattern represent a best-practice how to solve the modeling problem? Are there alternative solutions? This field is associated with the property This is a property of type Text. :	The pattern is described and can be read as a best practice, in the sense that it provides a clear, small, and easy to apply solution to a recurrent problem. My understanding of the pattern is that it provides a nice vocabulary and specific axiomatization for the usage of the n-ary relation pattern when dealing with modeling contexts. This is perfectly fine, but in the text it seems that the author refers to some additional logical benefit that cannot be obtained with other solutions. I recommend to clarify this aspect.
Reusability info.pngIs the pattern reusable in many situations, or is it very specific? Also related to relevance (see above). This field is associated with the property This is a property of type Text. :	High reuse potential
Relations to Other Patterns info.pngIs the pattern related to other patterns? Are there similar patterns already in the catalog? In other domains? This field is associated with the property This is a property of type Text. :	I would describe it as a specialization of DnS , makes sense?

Review the pattern "presentation" and input your detailed comments below:

Overall Understandability info.pngIs the pattern easy to understand from the description? Are all details of the pattern clear? This field is associated with the property This is a property of type Text. :	Good
Clear Problem Description info.pngIs the problem description clear? There should not be any uncertainty as to what problem the pattern solves and under what conditions it is applicable. This field is associated with the property This is a property of type Text. :	It could be improved: see above
Clear Relevance and Consequences info.pngIs the relevance of the problem clear from reading the problem description, and are consequences of using the proposed solution stated? This field is associated with the property This is a property of type Text. :	It could be improved: see above
Clear Figures and Illustrations info.pngAre examples, figures and other illustrations of the pattern clear and relevant? Are notations explained (if non-standard)? This field is associated with the property This is a property of type Text. :	yes
Missing information info.pngIs there any information missing about the pattern? This field is associated with the property This is a property of type Text. :	Nothing to add with respect to the above comments.

Edit Content OP Proposal Review Edit Form: Reviews:ValentinaPresutti about Context Slices

From Odp

Views

Personal tools

Navigation

Contribute

Help

Catalogues

Quality Committee

Content OP publishers

Editorial Board

Administrator

WOP

Search

Toolbox