Submissions:An Ontology Design Pattern for Activity Reasoning
From Odp
Current revision (03:37, 16 September 2014) (view source) |
|||
(7 intermediate revisions not shown.) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Content_OP_Proposal_toolbar}} | {{Content_OP_Proposal_toolbar}} | ||
{{Graphical representation header}} | {{Graphical representation header}} | ||
- | {{Graphical representation}} | + | {{Graphical representation |
+ | |ImageName=Activity3_small.png | ||
+ | }} | ||
{{Content OP Proposal Template | {{Content OP Proposal Template | ||
|SubmittedBy=YingjieHu | |SubmittedBy=YingjieHu | ||
- | |Name= | + | |Name=Activity Pattern |
|Intent=To incorporate the general two perspectives of activities: a workflow perspective, which are often observed in planning-related applications, and a spatiotemporal perspective, which are often found in geographic activity analysis. | |Intent=To incorporate the general two perspectives of activities: a workflow perspective, which are often observed in planning-related applications, and a spatiotemporal perspective, which are often found in geographic activity analysis. | ||
- | |CompetencyQuestion=What are the requirements to complete an activity? | + | |Domain=Workflow,General |
- | Which places are involved in the activity? | + | |CompetencyQuestion=What are the requirements to complete an activity?, Which places are involved in the activity?, |
- | Can other planned activities/tasks be combined with this activity? | + | Can other planned activities/tasks be combined with this activity?, |
- | Which chained activities are necessary to achieve this activity? | + | Which chained activities are necessary to achieve this activity?, |
- | Which activities are afforded by specific places? | + | Which activities are afforded by specific places?, |
Where and when to acquire an activity-relevant object? | Where and when to acquire an activity-relevant object? | ||
- | |ContentODPDescription=Activity is an important concept in many fields, and a number of | + | |ContentODPDescription=Activity is an important concept in many fields, and a number of activity-related ontologies have been developed. While suitable for their designated use cases, these ontologies cannot be easily generalized to other applications. This work aims at providing a generic ontology design pattern to model the common core of activities in different domains. Such a pattern can be used as a building block to construct more specific activity ontologies. |
- | activity-related ontologies have been developed. While suitable for their designated use cases, these ontologies cannot be easily generalized to other applications. This work aims at providing a generic ontology design pattern to model the common core of activities in different domains. Such a pattern can be used as a building block to construct more specific activity ontologies. | + | |
|ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=http://descartes-core.org/ontologies/activities/1.0/ActivityPattern.owl | |ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=http://descartes-core.org/ontologies/activities/1.0/ActivityPattern.owl | ||
|Consequences=Only two perspectives for activities are included in this pattern. While these two perspectives are commonly observed in existing work, other views toward activities may also need to be supported in future work. | |Consequences=Only two perspectives for activities are included in this pattern. While these two perspectives are commonly observed in existing work, other views toward activities may also need to be supported in future work. |
Current revision
If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) add a new scenario for An Ontology Design Pattern for Activity Reasoning In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 12001 |
Graphical representation
Diagram
General description
Name: | Activity Pattern |
---|---|
Submitted by: | YingjieHu |
Also Known As: | |
Intent: | To incorporate the general two perspectives of activities: a workflow perspective, which are often observed in planning-related applications, and a spatiotemporal perspective, which are often found in geographic activity analysis. |
Domains: | |
Competency Questions: |
|
Solution description: | Activity is an important concept in many fields, and a number of activity-related ontologies have been developed. While suitable for their designated use cases, these ontologies cannot be easily generalized to other applications. This work aims at providing a generic ontology design pattern to model the common core of activities in different domains. Such a pattern can be used as a building block to construct more specific activity ontologies. |
Reusable OWL Building Block: | http://descartes-core.org/ontologies/activities/1.0/ActivityPattern.owl (1005) |
Consequences: | Only two perspectives for activities are included in this pattern. While these two perspectives are commonly observed in existing work, other views toward activities may also need to be supported in future work. |
Scenarios: | Activity or task planning. Help find out which activities should be completed before other activities.Activity decomposition. Find out what are the sub-activities that constitute the super activity.Spatiotemporal queries. Find out the activities that happen at particular locations and time. |
Known Uses: | |
Web References: | |
Other References: | |
Examples (OWL files): | |
Extracted From: | |
Reengineered From: | |
Has Components: | |
Specialization Of: | |
Related CPs: |
Elements
The An Ontology Design Pattern for Activity Reasoning Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
Additional information
While this pattern so far focuses on human activities, the agents that are involved in this pattern may also be other autonomous agents, such as animals.
Scenarios
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 12001) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
Modeling issues
There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.
References