Submissions:ConceptGroup

From Odp

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Review has been assigned.)
Current revision (08:29, 31 May 2010) (view source)
m (Text replace - 'WOP2009:Main' to 'WOP:2009')
 
(10 intermediate revisions not shown.)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Content_OP_Proposal_toolbar}}
{{Content_OP_Proposal_toolbar}}
-
{{Include Image
+
{{Graphical representation header}}
 +
{{Graphical representation
|ImageName=ConceptGroupPattern.jpg
|ImageName=ConceptGroupPattern.jpg
}}
}}
Line 14: Line 15:
}}
}}
{{Element list header}}
{{Element list header}}
-
 
+
{{Additional information header}}
 +
[[Category:Review assigned]]
{{Scenarios about me}}
{{Scenarios about me}}
{{Reviews about me}}
{{Reviews about me}}
 +
{{Modeling issues about me}}
 +
{{My references}}
{{Submission to event
{{Submission to event
-
|Event=WOP2009:Main
+
|Event=WOP:2009
}}
}}
-
[[Category:Review assigned]]
 
-
[[Category:Review assigned]]
 
-
[[Category:Review assigned]]
 

Current revision


This pattern has been certified.

Related submission, with evaluation history, can be found here

If you are a member of quality committee please visit the

evaluation section

If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can:

In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal

Current revision ID: 9701

Graphical representation

Diagram

Image:ConceptGroupPattern.jpg

General description

Name: ConceptGroup
Submitted by: Pierre-YvesVandenbussche
Also Known As:
Intent: This CP allows designers to represent concept group defined by intention (all concepts satisfying group membership condition) or by extension (all concepts referring a group).
Domains:

Parts and Collections, Vocabulary

Competency Questions:
Solution description: How a group entity stands alone?, How to represent either a vocabulary subset, a cross vocabulary subset or a whole vocabulary?, How to represent group concept members?
Reusable OWL Building Block: http://sites.google.com/site/pierreyvesvandenbussche/resources/ConceptGroup.owl (1334)
Consequences:
Scenarios: Used to describe whole vocabulary entity or vocabulary concepts subset. Compliant with RefSets in SNOMED-CT or themes in GEMET.
Known Uses:
Web References:
Other References:
Examples (OWL files):
Extracted From:
Reengineered From:
Has Components:
Specialization Of:
Related CPs:


Elements

The ConceptGroup Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:

Additional information

Scenarios

Scenarios about ConceptGroup

No scenario is added to this Content OP.

Reviews

Reviews about ConceptGroup
Review article Posted on About revision (current is 9701)
MathieuDAquin about ConceptGroup 24550838 September 2009 56605,660
FrancoisScharffe about ConceptGroup 245508611 September 2009 57995,799
FrancoisScharffe about ConceptGroup 245508611 September 2009 57995,799
AldoGangemi about ConceptGroup 245508712 September 2009 58075,807

This revision (revision ID 9701) takes in account the reviews: none

Other info at evaluation tab


Modeling issues

Modeling issues about ConceptGroup

There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.


References

Add a reference


Submission to event

WOP:2009

Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers