Feedback:Pattern or generic terms
From Odp
(Difference between revisions)
(New page: {{TitleDescription Template |Title=Pattern or generic terms? |Description=Having a first look at the pattern it's not clear to me when something is a pattern rather than a generic (mini-)o...) |
Current revision (17:18, 4 July 2009) (view source) |
Current revision
Pattern or generic terms
Title: Pattern or generic terms?
Description: Having a first look at the pattern it's not clear to me when something is a pattern rather than a generic (mini-)ontology. My assumption was that pattern are at a domain independent level of abstraction and concrete domain specific ontologies would fill the pattern entities with domain specific terms. For the proposed content OPs however, I think many of them could be implemented as reusable ontologies rather than being pattern applied to many ontologies.
 Pattern or generic terms
| |
|---|---|
| Authors | RetoBachmann-Gmür |
| Priority | Medium |
| Status | To be done |
Create a task related to this feedback (only for sysop).
Go back to the Feedback main page
so now that I've filled all the mandatory fields, let's try to post this feedback again...
