Submissions:SynonymOrEquivalence (SOE)
From Odp
Current revision (08:30, 31 May 2010) (view source) m (Text replace - 'WOP2009:Main' to 'WOP:2009') |
|||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
{{My references}} | {{My references}} | ||
{{Submission to event | {{Submission to event | ||
| - | |Event= | + | |Event=WOP:2009 |
}} | }} | ||
Current revision
| If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 9708 |
Graphical representation
Diagram (this article has no graphical representation)
General information
| Name | SynonymOrEquivalence (SOE) |
|---|---|
| Also known as | |
| Author(s) | |
| SubmittedBy | Catherine Roussey, Oscar Corcho |
Description
| Motivation | We have identified a set of patterns that are commonly used by domain experts in their DL formalisations and OWL implementations, and that normally result in unsatisfiable classes or modelling errors. As aforementioned all these antipatterns come from a misuse and misunderstanding of DL expressions by ontology developers. Thus they are all Logical AntiPatterns (LAP): they are independent from a specific domain of interest, but dependent on the expressivity of the logical formalism used for the representation. We have categorized them into three groups: |
|---|---|
| Aim | The ontology developer wants to express that two classes C1 and C2 are identical. This is not very useful in a single ontology that does not import others. Indeed, what the ontology developer generally wants to represent is a terminological synonymy relation: the class C1 has two labels: C1 and C2. Usually one of the classes is not used anywhere else in the axioms defined in the ontology. |
| Solution description | C1 isEquivalentTo C2
The proposal for avoiding this antipattern is the following (if C2 is the less used term in the ontology) add all the comments and labels of C2 into C1 and remove C2 |
| Elements | |
| Implementation | |
| Reusable component | |
| Component type |
Example
| Problem example | Subterranean_Watercourses isEquivalentTo Subterranean_Rivers
see Corriente_Subterranea concept in Hydrontology |
|---|---|
| Pattern solution example | http://www.dia.fi.upm.es/~ocorcho/OWLDebugging/ |
| Consequences |
Pattern reference
| Origin | |
|---|---|
| Known use | |
| Reference | |
| Related ODP | |
| Used in combination with | |
| Test |
Additional information
Scenarios
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
| Review article | Posted on | About revision (current is 9708) |
|---|---|---|
| MartaSabou about SynonymOrEquivalence (SOE) | 24550838 September 2009 | 56175,617 |
| GerdGroener about SynonymOrEquivalence (SOE) | 24550838 September 2009 | 57095,709 |
This revision (revision ID 9708) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
Modeling issues
There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.
References
| Submission to event |
|---|
