Reviews:BorisVillaz�n-Terrazas about Normalization
Revision as of 18:15, 16 September 2010 by {{| (Talk | contribs)}} (New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2010/9/16 |SubmittedBy=BorisVillazón-Terrazas |ContentOPUnderReview=Normalization |RevisionID=10071 |Score=1 - needs minor revision |Re...)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

BorisVillazón-Terrazas about Normalization (Revision ID: 10071)

Overall suggestion (score): 1 - needs minor revision

Review Summary: This pattern is useful for validating a classification.

The submission needs to be detailed in a few respects: • Arrange the Solution of the description by enumerating the steps: o Indetify the modules o Create the modules, etc • Provide an example (an owl file of the graphical example), o maybe an excerpt of an input ontology, and the resultant ontology after the application of the pattern (the owl file) • Add a link to the Cell type Ontology, I was not able to find it.

• As already Catherine pointed out, it would be good to include in the example a disjoint relation.

Reviewer Confidence: Medium

Problems: This pattern is useful for validating a classification.

Community Relevance: High

Relation to Best Practices:

Reusability:

Relations to Other Patterns: Subsumption

Overall Understandability: Good presentation, but it can be improved, according to the suggestion given in the review summary.

Clear Problem Description: Good

Clear Relevance and Consequences: Good

Clear Figures and Illustrations: Good

Missing Information: The owl file of the input ontology and the resultant ontology after applying the pattern. Also, it would be good to include in the example a disjoint relation.

Posted: 2010/9/16 Last modified: 2010/09/16

All reviews | Add a comment at the bottom of this page