Submissions:Criterion

From Odp

Revision as of 19:09, 10 October 2011 by PiotrNowara (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


This pattern has been certified.

Related submission, with evaluation history, can be found here

If you are a member of quality committee please visit the

evaluation section

If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can:

In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal

Current revision ID: 10867

Graphical representation

Diagram

Image:Criterion.png

General description

Name: Criterion
Submitted by: PiotrNowara
Also Known As:
Intent: The purpose of this pattern is to provide a basis for criteria modeling. For more advanced use see the 'criterion setter' pattern that enables describing entities that define criteria (such as requirements, constraints etc.).
Domains:

General

Competency Questions:
  • What criterion is applied to a given thing?
  • What satisfies this criterion?
  • What thing is this criterion applied for?
Solution description: The criterion is defined as a subclass of description. The owl file linked below contains a simple example of how this pattern could be implemented for modeling a requirement (see 'Examples').
Reusable OWL Building Block: http://criteria-modeling.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/criterion.owl (1023)
Consequences:
Scenarios:
Known Uses:
Web References:
Other References:
Examples (OWL files):
Extracted From:
Reengineered From:
Has Components:
Specialization Of:
Related CPs:


Elements

The Criterion Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:

Additional information

See also: http://code.google.com/p/requirement-ontology/

Scenarios

Scenarios about Criterion

No scenario is added to this Content OP.

Reviews

Reviews about Criterion

There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 10867) takes in account the reviews: none

Other info at evaluation tab


Modeling issues

Modeling issues about Criterion

There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.


References

Add a reference


Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers