Reviews:MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa about Enlarge Class Definition for Resolving Disjointness due to Subsomption 2

From Odp

Revision as of 15:11, 8 September 2009 by MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Review Summary: It is not clear enough the motivation of this pattern. Indeed, in my opinion the example provided is not a good one (it seems strange to have a class called "Fauna-Flora"; what for me should be two different classes).
Reviewer Confidence: My confidence is high on modeling disjoint classes and hierarchies.
Problems: The main problem for me is due to the example provide in the pattern. It is not clear that such situation should be represented having a class missed different domain elements.
Community Relevance:
Relation to Best Practices:
Reusability:
Relations to Other Patterns:
Overall Understandability:
Clear Problem Description:
Clear Relevance and Consequences:
Clear Figures and Illustrations:
Missing Information:

Posted: 2009/9/8 Last modified: 2009/9/8

All reviews | Add a comment at the bottom of this page
Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers