Community:RinkeHoekstra about NegativePropertyAssertions

Revision as of 20:04, 24 October 2009 by RinkeHoekstra (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision→ (diff)

RinkeHoekstra about NegativePropertyAssertions (Revision ID: 5903)

Overall suggestion (score): -1 - reject

Review Summary: The author of this pattern fails to mention that the negative property assertions of OWL 2 are purely syntactic sugar for exactly the pattern he describes.

They are explicitly introduced in OWL 2 in e.g. the new features and rationale document.

In conclusion, this pattern may be useful to users sticking with OWL 1 (although I have no idea why they would want to), and as such can be a valuable contribution to this wiki. However, it would be wrong to attribute it to the current author (though he should receive credit for making it available on the wiki).

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/PR-owl2-new-features-20090922/#F3:_NegativeObjectPropertyAssertion_and_NegativeDataPropertyAssertion

Reviewer Confidence:

Problems:

Community Relevance:

Relation to Best Practices:

Reusability:

Relations to Other Patterns:

Overall Understandability:

Clear Problem Description:

Clear Relevance and Consequences:

Clear Figures and Illustrations:

Missing Information: