Submissions:Time indexed person role
From Odp
| If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 7096 |
General description
| Name: | Time indexed person role |
|---|---|
| Submitted by: | AldoGangemi |
| Also Known As: | |
| Intent: | To represent classification of things at a certain time. |
| Domains: | |
| Competency Questions: | |
| Solution description: | This pattern is encoded by specializing the situation pattern and composing it with the agent role pattern. |
| Reusable OWL Building Block: | http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/timeindexedpersonrole.owl (1019) |
| Consequences: | |
| Scenarios: | |
| Known Uses: | |
| Web References: | |
| Other References: | |
| Examples (OWL files): | |
| Extracted From: | |
| Reengineered From: | |
| Has Components: | |
| Specialization Of: | |
| Related CPs: |
Elements
The Time indexed person role Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
Person (owl:Class) Persons in commonsense intuition, i.e. either as physical agents (humans) or social persons.
Person page TimeIndexedPersonRole (owl:Class) A situation that expresses time indexing for the relation between persons and roles they play.
TimeIndexedPersonRole page(type): http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology
(imports): http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/agentrole.owl
(imports): http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/classification.owl
(versionInfo): Created with TopBraid Composer
(imports): http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/naryclassification.owl
(imports): http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/objectrole.owl
(imports): http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl
Scenarios
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 7096) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
