Submissions:RTMSmapping

From Odp

Revision as of 13:41, 8 March 2010 by EnricoDaga (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


This pattern has been certified.

Related submission, with evaluation history, can be found here

If you are a member of quality committee please visit the

evaluation section

If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can:

In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal

Current revision ID: 9114

Graphical representation

Diagram (this article has no graphical representation)

General description

Name: RTMSmapping
Submitted by: AldoGangemi
Also Known As:
Intent: to represent mappings between FSDAS application ontology network, and RTMS ontologies
Domains:
Competency Questions:
Solution description: --
Reusable OWL Building Block: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/fsdas/rtmsmapping.owl (746)
Consequences:
Scenarios:
Known Uses:
Web References:
Other References:
Examples (OWL files):
Extracted From:
Reengineered From:
Has Components:
Specialization Of:
Related CPs:


Elements

The RTMSmapping Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:

Class RTMS_Code (owl:Class) Any code RTMS relational database that is linked from the FIGIS XML.

For species, it can be possibly mapped to fi:FAO3AlphaCode, fi:FAOTaxonomicCode, or fi:ISSCAAPCode

RTMS_Code page
ObjectProperty hasRTMS_Code (owl:ObjectProperty)
hasRTMS_Code page

Additional information

(type): http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology

(versionInfo): Created by Aldo Gangemi

(imports): http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/schemas/cpannotationschema.owl

Scenarios

Scenarios about RTMSmapping

No scenario is added to this Content OP.

Reviews

Reviews about RTMSmapping

There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 9114) takes in account the reviews: none

Other info at evaluation tab


Modeling issues

Modeling issues about RTMSmapping

There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.


References

Add a reference


Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers