Community:RinkeHoekstra about Define Hybrid Class Resolving Disjointness due to Subsumption 2 Revision as of 16:10, 25 October 2009 by RinkeHoekstra (Talk | contribs) (New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2009-10-25 |SubmittedBy=RinkeHoekstra |ContentOPUnderReview=Define Hybrid Class Resolving Disjointness due to Subsumption |RevisionID=58...) (diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

{{#reviewabout:Submissions:Define Hybrid Class Resolving Disjointness due to Subsumption|}}

RinkeHoekstra about Define Hybrid Class Resolving Disjointness due to Subsumption (Revision ID: Hybrid Class Resolving Disjointness due to Subsumption?oldid=5867 5867)

Overall suggestion (score): 1 - needs minor revision

Review Summary: Correction to my previous review (considering the discussion at WOP at ISWC 2009). Unfortunately I cannot change it anymore, some of my remarks were slightly jet-lagged induced.

Reviewer Confidence:

Problems:

Community Relevance:

Relation to Best Practices:

Reusability:

Relations to Other Patterns:

Overall Understandability:

Clear Problem Description:

Clear Relevance and Consequences:

Clear Figures and Illustrations:

Missing Information:

Posted: 2009-10-25 Last modified: 2009/10/25

All reviews | Add a comment at the bottom of this page