Community:RinkeHoekstra about NegativePropertyAssertions
From Odp
(Difference between revisions)
RinkeHoekstra (Talk | contribs)
(New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2009-10-24 |SubmittedBy=RinkeHoekstra |ContentOPUnderReview=NegativePropertyAssertions |RevisionID=5903 |Score=-1 - reject |ReviewSummar...)
Next diff →
Current revision
RinkeHoekstra about NegativePropertyAssertions (Revision ID: 5903)
Overall suggestion (score): -1 - reject
Review Summary: The author of this pattern fails to mention that the negative property assertions of OWL 2 are purely syntactic sugar for exactly the pattern he describes.
They are explicitly introduced in OWL 2 in e.g. the new features and rationale document.
In conclusion, this pattern may be useful to users sticking with OWL 1 (although I have no idea why they would want to), and as such can be a valuable contribution to this wiki. However, it would be wrong to attribute it to the current author (though he should receive credit for making it available on the wiki).
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/PR-owl2-new-features-20090922/#F3:_NegativeObjectPropertyAssertion_and_NegativeDataPropertyAssertionReviewer Confidence:
Problems:
Community Relevance:
Relation to Best Practices:
Reusability:
Relations to Other Patterns:
Overall Understandability:
Clear Problem Description:
Clear Relevance and Consequences:
Clear Figures and Illustrations:
Missing Information:
Posted: 2009-10-24 Last modified: 2009/10/24