Reviews:BorisVillaz�n-Terrazas about Define Hybrid Class Resolving Disjointness due to Subsomption Revision as of 00:51, 9 September 2009 by {{| (Talk | contribs)}} (New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2009/9/9 |SubmittedBy=BorisVillazón-Terrazas |ContentOPUnderReview=Define Hybrid Class Resolving Disjointness due to Subsomption |Revis...) (diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

{{#reviewabout:Submissions:Define Hybrid Class Resolving Disjointness due to Subsomption|}}

BorisVillazón-Terrazas about Define Hybrid Class Resolving Disjointness due to Subsomption (Revision ID: Hybrid Class Resolving Disjointness due to Subsomption?oldid=5627 5627)

Overall suggestion (score): 1 - needs minor revision

Review Summary: This pattern solves disjointness (caused by subsumption), by defining a hybrid class. It can lead to discussions during WOP.

Reviewer Confidence: Low

Problems:

Community Relevance: High

Relation to Best Practices:

Reusability:

Relations to Other Patterns:

Overall Understandability: Medium

Clear Problem Description: Yes

Clear Relevance and Consequences: Yes

Clear Figures and Illustrations: For a better understanding of the pattern, I think figures can be transformed to PNG.

Missing Information: Perhaps some "real" usage of the proposed pattern can be found.

Posted: 2009/9/9 Last modified: 2009/09/9

All reviews | Add a comment at the bottom of this page