From Odp

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search

Revision as of 08:58, 16 August 2009

This pattern has been certified.

Related submission, with evaluation history, can be found here

If you are a member of quality committee please visit the

evaluation section

If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can:

In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal

Current revision ID: 5509

General description

Name: ConceptTerms
Submitted by: Pierre-YvesVandenbussche
Also Known As:
Competency Questions:
Solution description:
Reusable OWL Building Block: (7)
Known Uses:
Web References:
Other References:
Examples (OWL files):
Extracted From:
Reengineered From:
Has Components:
Specialization Of:
Related CPs:


The ConceptTerms Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:


Scenarios about ConceptTerms

This ontology describes example coming from Eurovoc( where a concept has a preferred term "social sciences" in english and a simple non preferred term (i.e. synonyms) "humanities" in the same language whereas the same concept has a preferred term "sciences sociales" in french and a simple non preferred term "sciences humaines" in this language. We consider a second preferred term in english "award" which names a concept. In this particular information retrieval context, we define a coumpound non preferred term "social sciences awards" which is related to preferred terms "social sciences" and "award". >>>


Reviews about ConceptTerms
Review article Posted on About revision (current is 5509)
WimPeters about ConceptTerms 24550838 September 2009 56265,626
MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa about ConceptTerms 24550838 September 2009 57145,714
VojtechSvatek about ConceptTerms 24550838 September 2009 57145,714

This revision (revision ID 5509) takes in account the reviews: WimPeters about ConceptTerms, VojtechSvatek about ConceptTerms, MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa about ConceptTerms

Other info at evaluation tab

Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers