Community:RinkeHoekstra about Partition

{{#reviewabout:Submissions:Partition|}}

RinkeHoekstra about Partition (Revision ID: 5901)

Overall suggestion (score): 0 - needs major revision

Review Summary: Well.. what can I say. This pattern again (cf. the pattern for negative property assertions) describes what is already covered by the OWL 2 specification as syntactic sugar. Although I agree that this may be useful for those not willing or able to commit to OWL 2, the pattern should be attributed to the OWL 2 specification, and not the current author of this pattern.

Reviewer Confidence:

Problems:

Community Relevance:

Relation to Best Practices:

Reusability:

Relations to Other Patterns:

Overall Understandability:

Clear Problem Description:

Clear Relevance and Consequences:

Clear Figures and Illustrations:

Missing Information:

Posted: 2009-10-25 Last modified: 2009/10/25

All reviews | Add a comment at the bottom of this page