Difference between revisions of "Reviews:LuigiIannone about Partition"

Latest revision as of 10:00, 7 September 2009

{{#reviewabout:Submissions:Partition|}}

LuigiIannone about Partition (Revision ID: 5616)

Overall suggestion (score): 1 - needs minor revision

Review Summary: The example could be more explanatory, maybe describing a real ontology situation rather than using letters. A scenario could be added too.

Reviewer Confidence: High

Problems:

Community Relevance:

Relation to Best Practices:

Reusability:

Relations to Other Patterns:

Overall Understandability:

Clear Problem Description:

Clear Relevance and Consequences:

Clear Figures and Illustrations:

Missing Information:

Posted: 2009/9/7 Last modified: 2009/09/7