Difference between revisions of "Reviews:HenrikEriksson about Partition"

Latest revision as of 22:40, 8 September 2009

{{#reviewabout:Submissions:Partition|}}

HenrikEriksson about Partition (Revision ID: 5748)

Overall suggestion (score): 0 - needs major revision

Review Summary: This is definitely a pattern that should be every ontology engineer's toolbox. However, the current description is poor. The wording in the motivation and aim should be improved and examples added.

Reviewer Confidence: High

Problems: The pattern documentation needs improvements. Examples should be added.

Community Relevance: Relevant, but somewhat trivial.

Relation to Best Practices: This pattern is quite universal and commonly used (although you may not think of it).

Reusability: The pattern is generic.

Relations to Other Patterns:

Overall Understandability: Fundamentally, the pattern is easy to understand. However, the current description is unclear which makes the pattern more difficult to understand.

Clear Problem Description: Currently, none at all.

Clear Relevance and Consequences: No.

Clear Figures and Illustrations: Currently, no figures.

Missing Information: Problem description, examples, figures.

Posted: 2009/9/9 Last modified: 2009/09/8