(Review has been created. Annotation 'assigned' has been removed.) |
(Reviews corrections) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Content OP Proposal Template | {{Content OP Proposal Template | ||
| − | |SubmittedBy=Pierre-YvesVandenbussche | + | |SubmittedBy=Pierre-YvesVandenbussche, JeanCharlet |
|Name=ConceptTerms | |Name=ConceptTerms | ||
| − | |Intent=This CP allows designers to represent | + | |Intent=This CP allows designers to represent both conceptual and linguistic part of a vocabulary. |
| + | The pattern purpose is not to encompass all linguistic complexity as Linginfo(http://olp.dfki.de/LingInfo/index.php) or LMF(http://www.lexicalmarkupframework.org/) does, but to describe linguistic information in more details than simple labels on a concept as SKOS does. This pattern suits for various vocabularies (thesaurus, terminology, taxonomy…) and has been applied to GEMET, Eurovoc, CIM10 among other. | ||
| + | Modeling takes into account: | ||
| + | -the possibility to extend the current pattern in order to add some more precise linguistic information (for instance represent translation relation between two terms since term is a class) | ||
| + | -minimal linguistic artifacts necessary for vocabulary resource access by providing a preferred Term to name a concept and some synonyms which are Simple non preferred terms. | ||
|Domain=Linguistic, Vocabulary, | |Domain=Linguistic, Vocabulary, | ||
|CompetencyQuestion=How to distinguish a preferred term or label from synonyms in order to name a concept?, How to enable cross language searching?, How to allow adding properties on term? | |CompetencyQuestion=How to distinguish a preferred term or label from synonyms in order to name a concept?, How to enable cross language searching?, How to allow adding properties on term? | ||
| Line 12: | Line 16: | ||
|ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=http://sites.google.com/site/pierreyvesvandenbussche/resources/ConceptTerms.owl | |ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=http://sites.google.com/site/pierreyvesvandenbussche/resources/ConceptTerms.owl | ||
|Consequences=Compare to labels on a concept class, this solution has a higher data load. | |Consequences=Compare to labels on a concept class, this solution has a higher data load. | ||
| − | |Scenario=Used for | + | |Scenario=Used for vocabulary representation. For example in Eurovoc(http://europa.eu/eurovoc/), a concept has a preferred term "social sciences" in english and a simple non preferred term (i.e. synonyms) "humanities" in the same language whereas the same concept has a preferred term "sciences sociales" in french and a simple non preferred term "sciences humaines" in this language. If we wanted to add a translation relation between terms we could state that "social sciences" english term is a translation of "sciences sociales" french term. If we consider a second preferred term in english "award" which names a concept, in a particular information retrieval context, we could define a coumpound non preferred term "social sciences awards" which is related to preferred terms "social sciences" and "award". |
| − | |ReengineeredFrom=BS8723-5 model: http://schemas.bs8723.org/ | + | |ReengineeredFrom=BS8723-5 model: http://schemas.bs8723.org/Examples.aspx In BS8723 model, triangular-shaped relations are defined between a thesaurus concept, a preferred term and some simple non preferred terms. We are convinced that maintaining this model can be optimized by reifying those relations in a single relation class. That is why we defines the Concept-Terms relation which reusing N-ary pattern in order to represent terms on a concept. Between all terms, we distinguish a preferred term and some synonyms (simple non preferred terms). |
}} | }} | ||
{{Element list header}} | {{Element list header}} | ||
| + | {{Takes in account review | ||
| + | |TakesInAccountReview=WimPeters about ConceptTerms | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Takes in account review | ||
| + | |TakesInAccountReview=VojtechSvatek about ConceptTerms | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Takes in account review | ||
| + | |TakesInAccountReview=MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa about ConceptTerms | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Scenarios about me}} | {{Scenarios about me}} | ||
|
Last modified date is: 2009-09-17 |
| Name: | ConceptTerms |
|---|---|
| Submitted by: | Pierre-YvesVandenbussche, JeanCharlet |
| Also Known As: | |
| Intent: | This CP allows designers to represent both conceptual and linguistic part of a vocabulary.
The pattern purpose is not to encompass all linguistic complexity as Linginfo(http://olp.dfki.de/LingInfo/index.php) or LMF(http://www.lexicalmarkupframework.org/) does, but to describe linguistic information in more details than simple labels on a concept as SKOS does. This pattern suits for various vocabularies (thesaurus, terminology, taxonomy…) and has been applied to GEMET, Eurovoc, CIM10 among other. Modeling takes into account: -the possibility to extend the current pattern in order to add some more precise linguistic information (for instance represent translation relation between two terms since term is a class) -minimal linguistic artifacts necessary for vocabulary resource access by providing a preferred Term to name a concept and some synonyms which are Simple non preferred terms. |
| Domains: | |
| Competency Questions: | |
| Solution description: | A concept is named in a particular language by a preferred term and a set of simple non preferred terms. Those terms artifacts specialize the term entity which owns common properties for terms such as: language, source information (when creating vocabulary from corpora). This list of properties may be extended depending on vocabulary specific needs. |
| Reusable OWL Building Block: | 1 (746) |
| Consequences: | Compare to labels on a concept class, this solution has a higher data load. |
| Scenarios: | Used for vocabulary representation. For example in Eurovoc(http://europa.eu/eurovoc/), a concept has a preferred term "social sciences" in english and a simple non preferred term (i.e. synonyms) "humanities" in the same language whereas the same concept has a preferred term "sciences sociales" in french and a simple non preferred term "sciences humaines" in this language. If we wanted to add a translation relation between terms we could state that "social sciences" english term is a translation of "sciences sociales" french term. If we consider a second preferred term in english "award" which names a concept, in a particular information retrieval context, we could define a coumpound non preferred term "social sciences awards" which is related to preferred terms "social sciences" and "award". |
| Known Uses: | |
| Web References: | |
| Other References: | |
| Examples (OWL files): | |
| Extracted From: | |
| Reengineered From: |
|
| Has Components: | |
| Specialization Of: | |
| Related CPs: |
The ConceptTerms Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
This revision (revision ID 5825) takes in account the reviews: ConceptTerms (WimPeters about ConceptTerms, VojtechSvatek about ConceptTerms, MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa about ConceptTerms)
Other info at evaluation tab
|
Submission to event |
|---|
'Ontology Design Patterns'
