Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* Q: '''Can I add to or change the definition of an Exemplary Ontology''' | * Q: '''Can I add to or change the definition of an Exemplary Ontology''' | ||
* A: This is a Wiki, let your views be known. Per Wiki convention, it may be best to start a discussion first, before making large changes. | * A: This is a Wiki, let your views be known. Per Wiki convention, it may be best to start a discussion first, before making large changes. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | * Q: '''Should I submit an ontology that is exemplary in most ways if it has significant flaws?''' | ||
+ | * A: If you think the community should know about the exemplary aspects of this ontology (especially if it has a significant user community), then it makes sense to submit it. Clearly indicate the flaws in the Known Issues field and elaborate as necessary in the Long Description or Additional Information field. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | * Q: '''What should I do if there are one or more modules in an ontology that are exemplary, but overall I do not consider the ontology to be exemplary?''' | ||
+ | * A: If the module exists as a separate module (e.g. an imported .owl file) then enter it on its own. You may also wish to see if it uses existing design patterns, and augment the documentation with the new example. Or perhaps you can identify a new design pattern that this module illustrates. | ||