Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
# if you do find a relevant thread, | # if you do find a relevant thread, | ||
## the content is very raw and hard to digest; | ## the content is very raw and hard to digest; | ||
− | ## there are usually no summaries, and if there are, they are not easy to find | + | ## there are usually no summaries, and if there are, they are not easy to find; |
− | # it is often easier just to ask the question again, and the cycle continues | + | # there is no agreed place to go to find out about modeling issues; |
− | + | # it is often easier just to ask the question again, and the cycle continues. | |
− | To address these problems | + | We have created the [[Community:Main| ontology modeling issues]] section in the ODP Wiki To address these problems. It is a place: |
− | + | * to put final results of lively discussions of ontology modeling issues, | |
+ | * for the ideas to be further refined by the community. | ||
In it you will find a number of modeling issues that have already been entered. | In it you will find a number of modeling issues that have already been entered. | ||
Line 18: | Line 19: | ||
# That summary is also posted to the ODP Wiki as a modeling issue, and cc'd to other relevant lists | # That summary is also posted to the ODP Wiki as a modeling issue, and cc'd to other relevant lists | ||
# The issue is further discussed and refined in the ODP Wiki. | # The issue is further discussed and refined in the ODP Wiki. | ||
+ | # Post major updates to relevant modeling lists. | ||
+ | |||
+ | An alternative is: | ||
+ | # Post a modeling issue directly on the ODP Wiki | ||
+ | # Post a note to any relevant discussion lists inviting them to contribute to the wiki | ||
+ | # Post major updates to any relevant discussion lists |
There is an enormous amount of valuable content sitting in discussion list archives. However:
We have created the ontology modeling issues section in the ODP Wiki To address these problems. It is a place:
In it you will find a number of modeling issues that have already been entered.
We envision the following steps in the evolution of a modeling issue:
An alternative is: