AldoGangemi (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Content_OP_Proposal_toolbar}} | {{Content_OP_Proposal_toolbar}} | ||
{{Include Image | {{Include Image | ||
| − | |ImageName= | + | |ImageName=Speciesconservation.jpg |
}} | }} | ||
{{Content OP Proposal Template | {{Content OP Proposal Template | ||
| + | |SubmittedBy=User:EvaBlomqvist | ||
|Name=SpeciesConservation | |Name=SpeciesConservation | ||
| − | | | + | |Intent=This pattern intend to represent a description of the conservation status of aquatic species. |
| − | + | ||
|CompetencyQuestion=What is the conservation status of this species? What are the species with a specific conservation status? What species' conservation status contain a specific string? | |CompetencyQuestion=What is the conservation status of this species? What are the species with a specific conservation status? What species' conservation status contain a specific string? | ||
| + | |ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/fsdas/speciesconservation.owl, | ||
|Consequences=The conservation status is simply represented as a string, there are no restrictions on how to express the status, thereby an additional convention on how to express this in natural language could be needed if a uniform naming of status levels is desired. | |Consequences=The conservation status is simply represented as a string, there are no restrictions on how to express the status, thereby an additional convention on how to express this in natural language could be needed if a uniform naming of status levels is desired. | ||
|Scenario=Give me the species for which conservation status contains 'Vulnerable'; Give me the species for which conservation status is 'vulnerable'; Give me the conservation status for species 'Ostrica gigas | |Scenario=Give me the species for which conservation status contains 'Vulnerable'; Give me the species for which conservation status is 'vulnerable'; Give me the conservation status for species 'Ostrica gigas | ||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Element list header}} | {{Element list header}} | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|HasElement=hasConservationStatus | |HasElement=hasConservationStatus | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | + | (type): http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology | |
{{Scenarios about me}} | {{Scenarios about me}} | ||
{{Reviews about me}} | {{Reviews about me}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|
Last modified date is: 2009-02-23 |
| Name: | SpeciesConservation |
|---|---|
| Submitted by: | User:EvaBlomqvist |
| Also Known As: | |
| Intent: | This pattern intend to represent a description of the conservation status of aquatic species. |
| Domains: | |
| Competency Questions: | |
| Solution description: | |
| Reusable OWL Building Block: | 1 (399) |
| Consequences: | The conservation status is simply represented as a string, there are no restrictions on how to express the status, thereby an additional convention on how to express this in natural language could be needed if a uniform naming of status levels is desired. |
| Scenarios: | Give me the species for which conservation status contains 'Vulnerable'; Give me the species for which conservation status is 'vulnerable'; Give me the conservation status for species 'Ostrica gigas |
| Known Uses: | |
| Web References: | |
| Other References: | |
| Examples (OWL files): | |
| Extracted From: | |
| Reengineered From: | |
| Has Components: | |
| Specialization Of: | |
| Related CPs: |
The SpeciesConservation Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
AquaticSpecies (owl:Class) Aquatic species are conceptual entities that are characterized together with resources and water areas.
Mappable to fi:Species, fi:SpeciesRef, fi:SpeciesFeature, etc.
It has related axioms from FIGIS Schema that are included in the classes linked to the fi:Species class, such as fi:SpeciesRef (holding association with fi:AqResRef, which holds association with fi:WaterAreaRef).
AquaticSpecies page(type): http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
This revision (revision ID 3551) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
'Ontology Design Patterns'
