Revision as of 02:03, 21 February 2010

Warning!

This is an old revision. Go to current revision

Last modified date is: 2010-02-21

General description

Name:	Tagging
Submitted by:	AldoGangemi
Also Known As:
Intent:	To represent a tagging situation, in which someone uses a term, from a list of a folksonomy, to tag something (or the content of something). We might also want to represent the time and the polarity of the tagging.
Domains:	General, Web2.0, DocumentManagement
Competency Questions:	Who is tagging (the content of) what by using what term from what folksonomy? Which polarity has the tagging?
Solution description:	Tagging pattern exploits the Situation pattern in order to encode Gruber's definition that has tagging as a relation between an agent, a tag from a folksonomy, a content tagged, a polarity.
Reusable OWL Building Block:	1 (550)
Consequences:	We are able to represent data about tagging activities from web 2.0 applications, from document annotation projects, or from RDFa documents.
Scenarios:	A Flickr picture showing a leopard, tagged with the Tag 'leopard', A Flickr picture showing a boy surfing with a sombrero hat, tagged with the Tag 'cool', A Flickr picture tagged as 'taken in Sicily'
Known Uses:
Web References:
Other References:
Examples (OWL files):
Extracted From:
Reengineered From:
Has Components:	Submissions:AgentRole Submissions:CollectionEntity Submissions:IntensionExtension
Specialization Of:	Submissions:TimeIndexedSituation
Related CPs:	Submissions:Topic

Elements

The Tagging Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:

byAgent (owl:ObjectProperty)

byAgent page

isTagUsedIn (owl:ObjectProperty)

isTagUsedIn page

isTaggingAgentIn (owl:ObjectProperty)

isTaggingAgentIn page

usingTag (owl:ObjectProperty)

usingTag page

The tagging ontology drafted by Tom Gruber in FOL, and formalized here in OWL by Aldo Gangemi with pattern-based design. A Tag is here classified as a linguistic object that is used in the context of a Tagging Situation, which also involves a (tagged) Entity, an Agent, and a Folksonomy.

Scenarios

Scenarios about Tagging

No scenario is added to this Content OP.

Reviews

Reviews about Tagging

There is no review about this proposal.

Some subquery has no valid condition.

This revision (revision ID 7006) takes in account the reviews: none

Other info at evaluation tab

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 |Domain=General, Web2.0, DocumentManagement
 |CompetencyQuestion=Who is tagging (the content of) what, by using what term from what folksonomy?, Which polarity has the tagging?
-|ContentODPDescription=Tagging pattern exploits the[[Community:Situation|Situation]] pattern in order to encode Gruber's definition that has tagging as a relation between an agent, a tag from a folksonomy, a content tagged, a polarity.
+|ContentODPDescription=Tagging pattern exploits the [[Submissions:Situation|Situation]] pattern in order to encode Gruber's definition that has tagging as a relation between an agent, a tag from a folksonomy, a content tagged, a polarity.
 |ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/tagging.owl
 |Consequences=We are able to represent data about tagging activities from web 2.0 applications, from document annotation projects, or from RDFa documents.

Difference between revisions of "Submissions:Tagging"

Revision as of 02:03, 21 February 2010

General description

Elements

Scenarios

Reviews