EnricoDaga (Talk | contribs) m (Text replace - 'Include Image' to 'Graphical representation') |
EnricoDaga (Talk | contribs) m (Text replace - '{{Reviews about me}}' to '{{Reviews about me}}{{Modeling issues about me}}') |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
(type): http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology | (type): http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology | ||
{{Scenarios about me}} | {{Scenarios about me}} | ||
| − | {{Reviews about me}} | + | {{Reviews about me}}{{Modeling issues about me}} |
|
Last modified date is: 2010-03-01 |
Diagram
| Name: | SpeciesConservation |
|---|---|
| Submitted by: | EvaBlomqvist |
| Also Known As: | |
| Intent: | This pattern intend to represent a description of the conservation status of aquatic species. |
| Domains: | |
| Competency Questions: | |
| Solution description: | |
| Reusable OWL Building Block: | 1 (399) |
| Consequences: | The conservation status is simply represented as a string, there are no restrictions on how to express the status, thereby an additional convention on how to express this in natural language could be needed if a uniform naming of status levels is desired. |
| Scenarios: | Give me the species for which conservation status contains 'Vulnerable'; Give me the species for which conservation status is 'vulnerable'; Give me the conservation status for species 'Ostrica gigas |
| Known Uses: | |
| Web References: | |
| Other References: | |
| Examples (OWL files): | |
| Extracted From: | |
| Reengineered From: | |
| Has Components: | |
| Specialization Of: | |
| Related CPs: |
The SpeciesConservation Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
AquaticSpecies (owl:Class) Aquatic species are conceptual entities that are characterized together with resources and water areas.
Mappable to fi:Species, fi:SpeciesRef, fi:SpeciesFeature, etc.
It has related axioms from FIGIS Schema that are included in the classes linked to the fi:Species class, such as fi:SpeciesRef (holding association with fi:AqResRef, which holds association with fi:WaterAreaRef).
AquaticSpecies page(type): http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
This revision (revision ID 8267) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
'Ontology Design Patterns'
