EnricoDaga (Talk | contribs) m (Text replace - '{{Reviews about me}}' to '{{Reviews about me}}{{Modeling issues about me}}') |
EnricoDaga (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Content_OP_Proposal_toolbar}} | {{Content_OP_Proposal_toolbar}} | ||
+ | {{Graphical representation header}} | ||
{{Graphical representation | {{Graphical representation | ||
|ImageName=Gearwaterarea.jpg | |ImageName=Gearwaterarea.jpg | ||
Line 27: | Line 28: | ||
|HasElement=isSuitableForGearType | |HasElement=isSuitableForGearType | ||
}} | }} | ||
+ | {{Additional information header}} | ||
(type): http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology | (type): http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology | ||
{{Scenarios about me}} | {{Scenarios about me}} | ||
− | {{Reviews about me}}{{Modeling issues about me}} | + | {{Reviews about me}} |
+ | {{Modeling issues about me}} | ||
+ | {{My references}} |
Diagram
Name: | GearWaterArea |
---|---|
Submitted by: | AlessandroAdamou |
Also Known As: | |
Intent: | to represent gear types in terms of the water areas where they can be employed to collect aquatic resources |
Domains: | |
Competency Questions: | |
Solution description: | -- |
Reusable OWL Building Block: | 1 (454) |
Consequences: | The relation between gear types and water areas is general, i.e. not expressed in terms of logistics, legal constraints etc. Note that no statement is made as for the domain of the hasWaterArea property, as it applies to both GearType and VesselType in other patterns, and in principle could apply to other entities. Hence the domain is expressed through superclass universal restrictions on the GearType class. |
Scenarios: | in which water areas are 'bottom gillnets'? |
Known Uses: | |
Web References: | |
Other References: | |
Examples (OWL files): | |
Extracted From: | |
Reengineered From: | |
Has Components: | |
Specialization Of: | |
Related CPs: |
The GearWaterArea Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
Mappable to fi:GeartypeRef
(type): http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
This revision (revision ID 9091) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab