Reviews:GerdGroener about SimpleOrAggregated
Revision as of 17:19, 10 September 2010 by GerdGroener (Talk | contribs) (New page: {{Content OP Proposal Review Template |CreationDate=2010/9/10 |SubmittedBy=GerdGroener |ContentOPUnderReview=SimpleOrAggregated |RevisionID=10097 |Score=2 - accept for certification |Revie...)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

GerdGroener about SimpleOrAggregated (Revision ID: 10097)

Overall suggestion (score): 2 - accept for certification

Review Summary: The pattern describes a disjoint partition of objects into simple and aggregated objects that consist of at least two objects.

The proposed solution seems to be sound.

There is just one minor remark (see problems).

Reviewer Confidence: high

Problems: I was a bit distracted by the terms "non-transitive fashion". What is non-transitive? Are the aggregated objects non-transitive connected? Is it relevant or why is it relevant? This should be clarified in the final version

Community Relevance: good

Relation to Best Practices: good

Reusability:

Relations to Other Patterns:

Overall Understandability: See the comment above (Problems)

Clear Problem Description:

Clear Relevance and Consequences:

Clear Figures and Illustrations:

Missing Information:

Posted: 2010/9/10 Last modified: 2010/09/10

All reviews | Add a comment at the bottom of this page