Community:Sex (of those who are not angels)
From Odp
(Difference between revisions)
(Two approaches to define the genre of a species) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Graphical representation}} | {{Graphical representation}} | ||
| - | {{Modeling Issue Template}} | + | {{Modeling Issue Template |
| + | |Author=Luigi Selmi | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Additional information header}} | {{Additional information header}} | ||
{{My references}} | {{My references}} | ||
{{Modeling Issue toolbar}} | {{Modeling Issue toolbar}} | ||
Revision as of 11:21, 23 January 2012
Sex (of those who are not angels)
Title: Sex (of those who are not angels)
Description: Sex, or more properly genre, can be used to separate a species in to two disjoint subsets: male and female. The two properties (in the sense of DOLCE) are rigid (by nature at list). So it seems to make sense to model the genre of a species, human for example, as two subproperties (subclasses) of dul:NaturalPerson: Woman and Man. An other approach could be tu create a Genre as a quality and then two qualia Male and Female as qualities of Natural Person or what ever other biological entity.
Diagram (this article has no graphical representation)
About
| Users | Luigi Selmi |
|---|---|
| Domains | |
| Competency Questions | |
| Scenarios | |
| Proposed Solutions (OWL files) | |
| Related patterns | |
Additional information
References
