Category:ContentOP

From Odp

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 8: Line 8:
They show the following characteristics:
They show the following characteristics:
 +
CPs encode conceptual, rather than logical design patterns. In other words,
 +
while Logical OPs solve design problems independently of a particular conceptualization, CPs propose patterns for solving design problems for the domain
 +
classes and properties that populate an ontology, therefore addressing con-
 +
tent problems. CPs are instantiations of Logical OPs (or of compositions
 +
of Logical OPs), featuring a non-empty signature. Hence, they have an explicit non-logical vocabulary for a speci�fic domain of interest (i.e. they are
 +
content-dependent). CPs provide solutions to domain modeling problems and
 +
a�ffect only the specifi�c region of the ontology dealing with such domain modeling problems. They are typically reused by applying specialization, extension,
 +
and composition to them. In principle, CPs do not depend on any specifi�c
 +
language, however in order to reuse them as building blocks, they have to be
 +
implemented in some way. In the portal we mainly deal with CPs
 +
in a Semantic Web context, hence we currently support OWL as a reference formalism for
 +
representation.
 +
References:
References:

Revision as of 10:35, 15 June 2009


Content Ontology Design Patterns (CPs)
CPs are distinguished networked ontologies and have their own namespace. They cover a specific set of competency questions (requirements), which represent the problem they provide a solution for. Furthermore, CPs show certain characteristics, i.e. they are: computational, small, autonomous, hierarchical, cognitively relevant, linguistically relevant, and best practices. See evaluation principles for more details.


Description

They show the following characteristics: CPs encode conceptual, rather than logical design patterns. In other words, while Logical OPs solve design problems independently of a particular conceptualization, CPs propose patterns for solving design problems for the domain classes and properties that populate an ontology, therefore addressing con- tent problems. CPs are instantiations of Logical OPs (or of compositions of Logical OPs), featuring a non-empty signature. Hence, they have an explicit non-logical vocabulary for a speci�fic domain of interest (i.e. they are content-dependent). CPs provide solutions to domain modeling problems and a�ffect only the specifi�c region of the ontology dealing with such domain modeling problems. They are typically reused by applying specialization, extension, and composition to them. In principle, CPs do not depend on any specifi�c language, however in order to reuse them as building blocks, they have to be implemented in some way. In the portal we mainly deal with CPs in a Semantic Web context, hence we currently support OWL as a reference formalism for representation.


References:

See also

Subcategories

This category has the following 2 subcategories, out of 2 total.

C

P

Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers