Submissions:Set
From Odp
| If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 10366 |
Graphical representation
Diagram
General description
| Name: | Set |
|---|---|
| Submitted by: | EvaBlomqvist |
| Also Known As: | |
| Intent: | To model sets of things (elements). A Set is a collection that cannot contain duplicate elements. |
| Domains: | |
| Competency Questions: |
|
| Solution description: | A Set is a collection that cannot contain duplicate elements. A Set is expressed by linking to it directly all the members (elements), multiple identical values of members (elements) will be eliminated because by default they are treated as a set. |
| Reusable OWL Building Block: | http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/set.owl (961) |
| Consequences: | |
| Scenarios: | |
| Known Uses: | |
| Web References: | |
| Other References: | |
| Examples (OWL files): | |
| Extracted From: | |
| Reengineered From: | |
| Has Components: | |
| Specialization Of: | |
| Related CPs: |
Elements
The Set Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
Additional information
A Set is a collection that cannot contain duplicate elements. A Set is expressed by linking to it directly all the members (elements), multiple identical values of members (elements) will be eliminated because by default they are treated as a set.
The collections ontology (part of the SWAN ontologies) that this pattern is based on was created by Paolo Ciccarese - Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, and Marco Ocana - Balboa Systems Inc. The original ontologies, and related information, are available under a Creative Commons License.
Scenarios
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 10366) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
Modeling issues
There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.
References
