Community:RinkeHoekstra about Partition

From Odp

Revision as of 02:07, 25 October 2009 by RinkeHoekstra (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

RinkeHoekstra about Partition (Revision ID: 5901)

Overall suggestion (score): 0 - needs major revision

Review Summary: Well.. what can I say. This pattern again (cf. the pattern for negative property assertions) describes what is already covered by the OWL 2 specification as syntactic sugar. Although I agree that this may be useful for those not willing or able to commit to OWL 2, the pattern should be attributed to the OWL 2 specification, and not the current author of this pattern.
Reviewer Confidence:
Community Relevance:
Relation to Best Practices:
Relations to Other Patterns:
Overall Understandability:
Clear Problem Description:
Clear Relevance and Consequences:
Clear Figures and Illustrations:
Missing Information:

Posted: 2009-10-25 Last modified: 2009/10/25

All reviews | Add a comment at the bottom of this page
Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers