Training:PhD Course on Computational Ontologies @ University of Bologna 2011/Ontology Testing/ArefniaScarlato

From Odp

Revision as of 14:54, 10 May 2011 (view source) Michelescarlato (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff		Revision as of 15:43, 10 May 2011 (view source) Michelescarlato (Talk | contribs) Next diff →
Line 16:		Line 16:
	|-		|-
	|}		|}
		+
		+
		+	Q1:
		+	What method/approach are you using (give a brief description)?
		+
		+	Abbiamo provato a tradurre in query sparql le competency questions.
		+
		+
		+	Q2:
		+	How did you apply the method, i.e. what did you do, what steps did you take?
		+
		+	Abbiamo inserito le query sparql nel TopBraid Sparql interpreter
		+
		+
		+	Q3:
		+	What was the result of applying this method? What mistakes did you find? (give a summary of the type of mistakes you were able to detect.
		+
		+	We don't have find any mistakes.
		+
		+
		+
		+	Q4:
		+	How long time did it take you to test the ontology using each approach you tried? Approximate the time you spent on it!
		+
		+	40 minutes.
		+
		+
		+	Q5:
		+	Do you see any limitations or problems with the way you tested the ontology? Would you be able to find any kind of error/mistake/problem using that method? Why/why not?
		+
		+	Maybe could be exist a method to generate directly query sparql from the natural language.

---

Revision as of 15:43, 10 May 2011

Testing Exercise - document your work on methods used

Number	Requirement tested	Method used	Test applied	Error(s) found	Suggestions/ideas for solution	Additional notes
0	We tested our ontologies , asking what instruments does a certain person play.	SELECT {?y WHERE :Chad_Smith :playsInstrument ?y } || || || ||
1
2
3
4

Q1: What method/approach are you using (give a brief description)?

Abbiamo provato a tradurre in query sparql le competency questions.

Q2: How did you apply the method, i.e. what did you do, what steps did you take?

Abbiamo inserito le query sparql nel TopBraid Sparql interpreter

Q3: What was the result of applying this method? What mistakes did you find? (give a summary of the type of mistakes you were able to detect.

We don't have find any mistakes.

Q4: How long time did it take you to test the ontology using each approach you tried? Approximate the time you spent on it!

40 minutes.

Q5: Do you see any limitations or problems with the way you tested the ontology? Would you be able to find any kind of error/mistake/problem using that method? Why/why not?

Maybe could be exist a method to generate directly query sparql from the natural language.