Submissions:Types of entities
From Odp
m (Text replace - '{{Reviews about me}}' to '{{Reviews about me}}{{Modeling issues about me}}') |
Current revision (14:06, 8 March 2010) (view source) m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Content_OP_Proposal_toolbar}} | {{Content_OP_Proposal_toolbar}} | ||
+ | {{Graphical representation header}} | ||
{{Graphical representation | {{Graphical representation | ||
|ImageName=Typesofentities.jpg | |ImageName=Typesofentities.jpg | ||
Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
|Domain=General | |Domain=General | ||
|CompetencyQuestion=What kind of entity is that?, Is this an event or an object?, Is this an abstract value or a quality of an entity? | |CompetencyQuestion=What kind of entity is that?, Is this an event or an object?, Is this an abstract value or a quality of an entity? | ||
+ | |ContentODPDescription=--- | ||
|ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/typesofentities.owl | |ReusableOWLBuildingBlock=http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/typesofentities.owl | ||
|Consequences=The type of any element of the knowledge base is always known. | |Consequences=The type of any element of the knowledge base is always known. | ||
Line 26: | Line 28: | ||
|HasElement=Quality | |HasElement=Quality | ||
}} | }} | ||
+ | {{Additional information header}} | ||
===Example=== | ===Example=== | ||
{{Example | {{Example | ||
Line 34: | Line 37: | ||
Figure shows the UML diagram of this scenario. | Figure shows the UML diagram of this scenario. | ||
}} | }} | ||
- | {{Reviews about me}}{{Modeling issues about me}} | + | {{Scenarios about me}} |
+ | {{Reviews about me}} | ||
+ | {{Modeling issues about me}} | ||
+ | {{My references}} |
Current revision
If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 9139 |
Graphical representation
Diagram
General description
Name: | Types of entities |
---|---|
Submitted by: | ValentinaPresutti |
Also Known As: | |
Intent: | To identify and categorize the most general types of things in the domain of discourse. |
Domains: | |
Competency Questions: |
|
Solution description: | --- |
Reusable OWL Building Block: | http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/typesofentities.owl (858) |
Consequences: | The type of any element of the knowledge base is always known. |
Scenarios: | |
Known Uses: | |
Web References: | |
Other References: | |
Examples (OWL files): | |
Extracted From: | |
Reengineered From: | |
Has Components: | |
Specialization Of: | |
Related CPs: |
Elements
The Types of entities Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
Abstract (owl:Class) any entity that cannot be located in space-time. E.g. mathematical entities, formal semantics elements, regions within dimensional spaces, etc.
Event (owl:Class) any physical, social, or mental process, event, or state. More theoretically, events can be classified in different ways, possibly based on aspect (e.g. stative, continuous, achievements, etc.), or on agentivity, typical participants (e.g. human, physical, abstract, food, etc.).
Quality (owl:Class) any aspect of an entity (but not a part of it), which cannot exist without that entity. For example, the way the surface of a specific physical object looks like is a Quality.
Additional information
Example
That copy of Divina Commedia is a book (Object), the porosity (Quality) of the paper used is 5 mls/min (Abstract). The Rock Music Festival (Event) is organized by a friend of mine (Object).
Figure shows the UML diagram of this scenario.
Scenarios
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 9139) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
Modeling issues
There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.
References