Submissions:Componency
From Odp
(Difference between revisions)
ValentinaPresutti (Talk | contribs)
(New page: {{Include Image |ImageName=componency.jpg }} {{Content OP Proposal Template |SubmittedBy=User:ValentinaPresutti |Name=componency |AlsoKnownAs=composition |Intent=To represent (non-transiti...)
Next diff →
Revision as of 14:05, 27 April 2008
General description
Name: | componency |
---|---|
Submitted by: | User:ValentinaPresutti |
Also Known As: | |
Intent: | To represent (non-transitively) that objects either are proper parts of other objects, or have proper
parts. |
Domains: | |
Competency Questions: |
|
Solution description: | |
Reusable OWL Building Block: | http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/componency.owl (1042) |
Consequences: | This Content OP allows designers to represent part-whole relations. It allows to distinguish between parts and proper parts. Relation of proper part is not transitive, and implies a simple part of relation, which is transitive. Temporal indexing is not expressible. To solve this issue see the time indexed part of Content OP. |
Scenarios: | The turbine is a proper part of the engine, both are parts of a car. Furthermore, the engine and the battery are proper parts of the car. |
Known Uses: | |
Web References: | |
Other References: | |
Examples (OWL files): | |
Extracted From: | |
Reengineered From: | |
Has Components: | |
Specialization Of: | |
Related CPs: |
Elements
The Componency Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
Reviews
Reviews about Componency
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 1304) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
This Content OP defines the above elements, it also includes the elements of part of Content OP.