Submissions:Computer System
From Odp
Revision as of 11:09, 16 January 2017
If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 13100 |
Graphical representation
Diagram (this article has no graphical representation)
General description
Name: | Computer System |
---|---|
Submitted by: | PanagiotisMitzias |
Also Known As: | |
Intent: | The pattern intends to model computer systems based on a hardware/software approach. |
Domains: | |
Competency Questions: |
What software or hardware is required so that some other software or hardware can operate properly? This relationship is represented with properties requiresSoftware and requiresHardware. What software or hardware is compatible with other software or hardware? This is expressed via the isCompatibleWith relationship. |
Solution description: | |
Reusable OWL Building Block: | http://mklab.iti.gr/pericles/ComputerSystem_ODP.owl (756) |
Consequences: | The design pattern is expected to facilitate the creation of computer system domain ontologies that can be exploited in numerous fields. A well-established, comprehensible pattern will prove to be advantageous. |
Scenarios: | Some examples of instantiation of the ComputerSystem ODP are:
1. �The computer uses Ubuntu 16.04� 2. �The graphics card requires driver A� 3. �The software is compatible with Windows 10� 4. �The processor is compatible with motherboard B� |
Known Uses: | |
Web References: | |
Other References: | |
Examples (OWL files): | |
Extracted From: | |
Reengineered From: | |
Has Components: | |
Specialization Of: | |
Related CPs: |
Elements
The Computer System Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
Additional information
Scenarios
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 13100) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
Modeling issues
There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.
References