Submissions:OnlynessIsLoneliness (OIL)
From Odp
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Logical_OP_Proposal_toolbar}} | {{Logical_OP_Proposal_toolbar}} | ||
{{Include Image | {{Include Image | ||
| - | |ImageName=[[Media:antipatternOIL. | + | |ImageName=[[Media:antipatternOIL.JPG]] |
}} | }} | ||
{{Logical OP General Template | {{Logical OP General Template | ||
Revision as of 16:02, 31 July 2009
| If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 5348 |
[[Image:Media:antipatternOIL.JPG]]
General information
| Name | OnlynessIsLoneliness (OIL) |
|---|---|
| Also known as | |
| Author(s) | |
| SubmittedBy | Catherine Roussey, Oscar Corcho |
Description
| Motivation | We have identified a set of patterns that are commonly used by domain experts in their DL formalisations and OWL implementations, and that normally result in unsatisfiable classes or modelling errors. As aforementioned all these antipatterns come from a misuse and misunderstanding of DL expressions by ontology developers. Thus they are all Logical AntiPatterns (LAP): they are independent from a specific domain of interest, but dependent on the expressivity of the logical formalism used for the representation. We have categorized them into three groups: |
|---|---|
| Aim | The ontology developer created a universal restriction to say that C1 instances can only be linked with property R to C2 instances. Next, a new universal restriction is added saying that C1 instances can only be linked with R to C3 instances, with C2 and C3 disjoint. In general, this is because the ontology developer forgot the previous axiom in the same class or in the parent class. |
| Solution description | C1 subClassOf R only C2; C1 subClassOf R only C3; C2 disjointWith C3
If it makes sense, we propose to the domain expert to transform the two universal restrictions into only one that refers to the disjunction of C2 and C3. C1 subClassOf R only (C2 or C3); C2 disjointWith C3 |
| Elements | |
| Implementation | |
| Reusable component | |
| Component type |
Example
| Problem example | Transtitional_Waters subClassOf is_nearby only Sea_Waters; Transitional_Waters subClassOf is_nearby only River_Mouths; River_Mouths disjointWith Sea_Waters
see Aguas_de_Transicion concept in hydrontology. |
|---|---|
| Pattern solution example | http://www.dia.fi.upm.es/~ocorcho/OWLDebugging/ |
| Consequences | Transtitional_Waters subClassOf is_nearby only (Sea_Waters or River_Mouths); River_Mouths disjointWith Sea_Waters |
Pattern reference
| Origin | |
|---|---|
| Known use | |
| Reference | |
| Related ODP | |
| Used in combination with | |
| Test |
Scenarios
Scenarios about OnlynessIsLoneliness (OIL)
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
Reviews about OnlynessIsLoneliness (OIL)
| Review article | Posted on | About revision (current is 5348) |
|---|---|---|
| LuigiIannone about OnlynessIsLoneliness (OIL) | 24550761 September 2009 | 56215,621 |
| AlessandroAdamou about OnlynessIsLoneliness (OIL) | 245508510 September 2009 | 57775,777 |
| StefanoDavid about OnlynessIsLoneliness (OIL) | 245508510 September 2009 | 57875,787 |
| RinkeHoekstra about OnlynessIsLoneliness (OIL) | 245512924 October 2009 | 57875,787 |
This revision (revision ID 5348) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab
| Submission to event |
|---|
