Submissions:Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to Co-participation ODP
From Odp
If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) add a new scenario for Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to Co-participation ODP In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 7657 |
Description
Name | Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to Co-participation ODP |
---|---|
Language | English |
Also known as | LSP-PCP-EN |
Intent | Recurrent expressions in English that state that two objects participate in the same event |
Solution description | The set of Lexico-Syntactic ODPs included here have a direct correspondence to the Content ODP for modelling "Co-participation". |
Description of the correspondence relation between the LSPs and the ODPs | one LSP to one ODP |
Related ODP(s) | Submissions:http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Submissions:Co-participation |
Web reference | http://www.neon-project.org/web-content/images/Publications/neon_2008_d2.5.1.pdf |
Author(s) | Elena Montiel-Ponsoda, Guadalupe Aguado de Cea, Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa, Asunción Gómez-Pérez |
Submitted by | ElenaMontiel-Ponsoda |
Cases
The Lexico Syntactic ODPs corresponding to Co-participation ODP Lexico-Syntactic ODP includes the following cases (see also abbreviations and symbols used in LSP Formalization):
NL Formulation
- Aldo Gangemi and Valentina Presutti participate in the ISWC 2007 conference.
LSP Formalization
(NP<object>,)* and NP<object> participate/(take part)/(be involved) in [(NP<event>,)* and] NP<event>
Reusable JAPE code: -
1 page
NL Formulation
- Action Engine participates with Microsoft at 3GSM World Congress.
LSP Formalization
NP<object> participate/(take part)/(be involved) with in [(NP<event>,)* and] NP<event>
Reusable JAPE code: -
2 page
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 7657) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab