Submissions:InformationObjectsAndRepresentationLanguages
From Odp
If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) add a new scenario for InformationObjectsAndRepresentationLanguages In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 8097 |
Diagram (this article has no graphical representation)
General description
Name: | informationObjectsAndRepresentationLanguages |
---|---|
Submitted by: | AldoGangemi |
Also Known As: | |
Intent: | |
Domains: | |
Competency Questions: | |
Solution description: | |
Reusable OWL Building Block: | http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/informationobjectsandrepresentationlanguages.owl (766) |
Consequences: | |
Scenarios: | |
Known Uses: | |
Web References: | |
Other References: | |
Examples (OWL files): | |
Extracted From: | |
Reengineered From: | |
Has Components: | |
Specialization Of: | |
Related CPs: |
Elements
The InformationObjectsAndRepresentationLanguages Content OP locally defines the following ontology elements:
E.g., 'the predicate 'MariachiInTijuana' formallyRepresents the dul:Collection of all mariachis in Tijuana'; 'the equivalence relation '<=>' formallyRepresents the concept of two entities having the same properties'.
Notice that formal expressions are formally interpreted by instances of dul:FormalEntity
E.g., 'the predicate 'MariachiInTijuana' formallyRepresents the dul:Collection of all mariachis in Tijuana'; 'the equivalence relation '<=>' formallyRepresents the concept of two entities having the same properties'.
Notice that formal expressions are formally interpreted by instances of dul:FormalEntity
Another distinction, between the general (systemic) rules for a language, and the local (contextual) rules for e.g. a certain context, speaker, place, etc., can be made separately.
The most comprehensive classification of languages ha probably been made by Umberto Eco, based on the production modes of the 'signs' that are represented in a certain language. It uses several semiotic dimensions, and will be modeled in a forthcoming ontology.
Natural languages components are 'temporary' and 'reconstructed' out of actual usage. For example, a grammar for a (part of a) natural language has the status of a theory for that language, but alternative ones can exist (e.g. generative vs. construction grammars).
Scenarios
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 8097) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab