Community:View Inheritance

From Odp

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
{{TitleDescription Template
{{TitleDescription Template
|Title=View Inheritance
|Title=View Inheritance
-
|Description=Representation of multiple alternative abstraction criteria of a certain ontology domain concept
+
|Description=Representation of the multiple alternative criteria available to classify the abstractions of a certain ontology domain concept.
}}
}}
{{Graphical representation}}
{{Graphical representation}}
Line 7: Line 7:
|Author=BenedictoRodriguezCastro, HughGlaser
|Author=BenedictoRodriguezCastro, HughGlaser
|Domain=General
|Domain=General
 +
|CompetencyQuestion=For example, in the case of the representation of the "wine" domain concept:
 +
* Allow me to select a bottle of wine by color, region, flavour and(or) ocassion.
 +
 +
In the case of the representation of the "pizza" domain concept:
 +
* Allow me to select a pizza based on the type of base, the toppings and(or) the name.
 +
 +
|Scenario=As an example from the object-oriented design, consider the alternative criteria that are avaible to classify the abstraction of a simple domain concepts such as "employee":
 +
* Employee: by contract type (permanent vs. temporary), by job type (engineering, administrative, managerial).
 +
 +
Similar examples exist in the ontology design field such us "wine" and "pizza":
 +
* Wine: color, region, flavour, ocassion, etc.
 +
* Pizza: base (deep pan, thin), topping (cheese, meat, vegetable, etc.), name (margherita, american, etc.)
 +
 +
|ProposedSolution=
 +
 +
|RelatedPattern=
}}
}}
{{Additional information header}}
{{Additional information header}}

Revision as of 17:25, 9 March 2010

View Inheritance

Title: View Inheritance

Description: Representation of the multiple alternative criteria available to classify the abstractions of a certain ontology domain concept.

Diagram (this article has no graphical representation)

About

Users BenedictoRodriguezCastro, HughGlaser
Domains General
Competency Questions For example, in the case of the representation of the "wine" domain concept:
  • Allow me to select a bottle of wine by color, region, flavour and(or) ocassion.

In the case of the representation of the "pizza" domain concept:

  • Allow me to select a pizza based on the type of base, the toppings and(or) the name.
Scenarios As an example from the object-oriented design, consider the alternative criteria that are avaible to classify the abstraction of a simple domain concepts such as "employee":
  • Employee: by contract type (permanent vs. temporary), by job type (engineering, administrative, managerial).

Similar examples exist in the ontology design field such us "wine" and "pizza":

  • Wine: color, region, flavour, ocassion, etc.
  • Pizza: base (deep pan, thin), topping (cheese, meat, vegetable, etc.), name (margherita, american, etc.)
Proposed Solutions (OWL files)
Related patterns


Additional information

References

Add a reference

  • Denton, William. How to Make a Faceted Classification and Put It On the Web. Nov 2003. Documentation | reference page
  • Normalization Ontology Design Pattern Documentation | reference page
  • Bertrand Meyer. Object-Oriented Software Construction (Book/CD-ROM) (2nd Edition). Prentice Hall PTR, March 2000. ISBN 0136291554. Documentation | reference page
  • N. F. Noy and D. McGuinness. Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. Technical Report SMI-2001-0880, Stanford Medical Informatics, Stanford, 2001. Documentation | reference page
  • Matthew Horridge, Nick Drummond, Simon Jupp, Georgina Moulton, Robert Stevens. A Practical Guide To Building OWL Ontologies Using Protege 4 and CO-ODE Tools Edition 1.2. Technical report, The University Of Manchester, March 2009. Documentation | reference page
  • Alan L. Rector. Modularisation of domain ontologies implemented in description logics and related formalisms including owl. In K-CAP '03: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Knowledge capture, pages 121{128, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM. ISBN 1-58113-583-1. Documentation | reference page
List of Modeling Issues | Post a new modeling issue | Add a comment in the discussion page
Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers