Submissions:Adrian Walker 2
From Odp
If you are a member of quality committee please visit the
If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can: specify if this revision takes in account any of the review(s) In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal Current revision ID: 6996 |
General information
Name | Adrian Walker |
---|---|
Also known as | |
Author(s) | |
SubmittedBy | Adrian Walker |
Description
Motivation | Enable government and other web sites to answer an open ended collection of English questions, and also to explain the answers in English. Support government folks and citizens socially networking, Wikipedia-style, to continually expand the range of questions that can be answered. |
---|---|
Aim | Integrate the semantics of data, with a semantics of an inference method, and
also with the meanings of open vocabulary, largely open syntax English sentences. |
Solution description | Please see
www.reengineeringllc.com/A_Wiki_for_Business_Rules_in_Open_Vocabulary_Executable_English.pdf |
Elements | 1. Lightweight natural language processor.
2. Semantic checker that makes helpful suggestions to authors 3. Reasoning engine based on provably correct model theoretic semantics 4. Explanation generator 5. Automatic SQL generator |
Implementation | Live online at www.reengineeringllc.com. Shared us is free. There are no advertisements.
Browser interface for writing and running applications. Java web interface for use as an SOA component, or for custom user interfaces |
Reusable component | http://www.reengineeringllc.com/iblClient1.java |
Component type | Extensible Java stub |
Example
Problem example | |
---|---|
Pattern solution example | |
Consequences |
Pattern reference
Origin | |
---|---|
Known use | |
Reference | |
Related ODP | |
Used in combination with | |
Test |
Scenarios
No scenario is added to this Content OP.
Reviews
There is no review about this proposal. This revision (revision ID 6996) takes in account the reviews: none
Other info at evaluation tab