Submissions:DisjointnessOfComplement (DOC)

From Odp

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Review has been assigned.)
Current revision (08:29, 31 May 2010) (view source)
m (Text replace - 'WOP2009:Main' to 'WOP:2009')
 
(4 intermediate revisions not shown.)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Logical_OP_Proposal_toolbar}}
{{Logical_OP_Proposal_toolbar}}
-
{{Include Image}}
+
{{Graphical representation header}}
 +
{{Graphical representation}}
{{Logical OP General Template
{{Logical OP General Template
|Name=DisjointnessOfComplement (DOC)
|Name=DisjointnessOfComplement (DOC)
-
|SubmittedBy=CatherineRoussey, OscarCorcho,  
+
|SubmittedBy=CatherineRoussey, OscarCorcho,
}}
}}
{{Logical OP Description Template
{{Logical OP Description Template
Line 18: Line 19:
}}
}}
{{Logical OP Reference Template}}
{{Logical OP Reference Template}}
-
 
+
{{Additional information header}}
 +
[[Category:Review assigned]]
{{Scenarios about me}}
{{Scenarios about me}}
{{Reviews about me}}
{{Reviews about me}}
 +
{{Modeling issues about me}}
 +
{{My references}}
{{Submission to event
{{Submission to event
-
|Event=WOP2009:Main
+
|Event=WOP:2009
}}
}}
-
[[Category:Review assigned]]
 
-
[[Category:Review assigned]]
 

Current revision


This pattern has been certified.

Related submission, with evaluation history, can be found here

If you are a member of quality committee please visit the

evaluation section

If you are author of this proposal or you want to contribute to this pattern's review, you can:

In general, it could be useful to visit the evaluation section to have information about the evaluation process of this proposal

Current revision ID: 9703

Graphical representation

Diagram (this article has no graphical representation)

General information

Name DisjointnessOfComplement (DOC)
Also known as
Author(s)
SubmittedBy CatherineRoussey, OscarCorcho


Description

Motivation We have identified a set of patterns that are commonly used by domain experts in their DL formalisations and OWL implementations, and that normally result in unsatisfiable classes or modelling errors. As aforementioned all these antipatterns come from a misuse and misunderstanding of DL expressions by ontology developers. Thus they are all Logical AntiPatterns (LAP): they are independent from a specific domain of interest, but dependent on the expressivity of the logical formalism used for the representation.
Aim The ontology developer may want to say that C1 and C2 cannot share instances, instead of defining C1 as the logical negation of C2. Hence it could be more appropriate to state that C1 and C2 are disjoint.
Solution description C1 isEquivalentTo not C2

should be replace by C1 disjointWith C2

Elements
Implementation
Reusable component
Component type


Example

Problem example Salt_Lagoon isEquivalentTo not Fresh_Waters

see concept Laguna_Salada in Hydrontology

Pattern solution example http://www.dia.fi.upm.es/~ocorcho/OWLDebugging/
Consequences


Pattern reference

Origin
Known use
Reference
Related ODP
Used in combination with
Test

Additional information

Scenarios

Scenarios about DisjointnessOfComplement (DOC)

No scenario is added to this Content OP.

Reviews

Reviews about DisjointnessOfComplement (DOC)
Review article Posted on About revision (current is 9703)
AlessandroAdamou about DisjointnessOfComplement (DOC) 24550838 September 2009 55975,597
MathieuDAquin about DisjointnessOfComplement (DOC) 24550838 September 2009 57165,716
GerdGroener about DisjointnessOfComplement (DOC) 245508510 September 2009 57805,780

This revision (revision ID 9703) takes in account the reviews: none

Other info at evaluation tab


Modeling issues

Modeling issues about DisjointnessOfComplement (DOC)

There is no Modeling issue related to this proposal.


References

Add a reference


Submission to event

WOP:2009

Personal tools
Quality Committee
Content OP publishers